[EU] Champions League 2008/2009 (37 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Alen

Ѕenior Аdmin
Apr 2, 2007
54,028
Whoever thinks Inter are that much better than us needs to be bitch-slapped.
Like i said, the 4-3-3 Inter, with Quaresma and Mancini, is not better than us at all.
But that 4-4-2 Inter with Muntari, Stankovic, Cambiasso and Zanetti in midfield, with Zlatan and Cruz/Adriano in attack, is better, i'm afraid.
 

mondo1

Senior Member
May 14, 2006
11,476
Like i said, the 4-3-3 Inter, with Quaresma and Mancini, is not better than us at all.
But that 4-4-2 Inter with Muntari, Stankovic, Cambiasso and Zanetti in midfield, with Zlatan and Cruz/Adriano in attack, is better, i'm afraid.
ya this 4-3-3 really don'T work for them hahaha they only bought mancini and quaresma for playing this system hahahaha
 

only-juve

Senior Member
Jan 5, 2008
7,451
Like i said, the 4-3-3 Inter, with Quaresma and Mancini, is not better than us at all.
But that 4-4-2 Inter with Muntari, Stankovic, Cambiasso and Zanetti in midfield, with Zlatan and Cruz/Adriano in attack, is better, i'm afraid.
Agree on that....It seems like both quarisma and mancini were a wasted deals....
 
OP
Azzurri7

Azzurri7

Pinturicchio
Moderator
Dec 16, 2003
72,692
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #3,593
    to be honest they were against us much better
    Yeah, they outplayed us in their home. But thats because we didn't really give our 100%. But all in all they're not really ahead of us. A bit maybe not more.

    Like i said, the 4-3-3 Inter, with Quaresma and Mancini, is not better than us at all.
    But that 4-4-2 Inter with Muntari, Stankovic, Cambiasso and Zanetti in midfield, with Zlatan and Cruz/Adriano in attack, is better, i'm afraid.
    I agree
    4-4-2 makes them look more solid than us, but not by miles like some people try to make it seem.
     

    Alen

    Ѕenior Аdmin
    Apr 2, 2007
    54,028
    ya this 4-3-3 really don'T work for them hahaha they only bought mancini and quaresma for playing this system hahahaha
    Inter were doing great with 4-4-2. There was no need for Mourinho to change the system, and yet he did at the begining. As it's being proven over and over again, you don't change the winning team (system). After he switched back to 4-4-2, they started beating everyone.
    They had so many DMCs and yet they bought Muntari. Sounds familiar?

    That's why i'm a little sceptical when people say that we didn't need DMCs (they said it for Sissoko and then for Poulsen) but we need AMCs.
    4-3-3 may work for us, but it may easily fail, like it happened to Inter. Ranieri knows our strenghts and he thinks that 4-4-2 works the best for our stars up front (Camoranesi and Del Piero).

    It's debatable, i know, but i had to use this example with Inter to tell some people how things are different on paper and on the pitch.
     

    mondo1

    Senior Member
    May 14, 2006
    11,476
    Yeah, they outplayed us in their home. But thats because we didn't really give our 100%. But all in all they're not really ahead of us. A bit maybe not more.



    I agree
    4-4-2 makes them look more solid than us, but not by miles like some people try to make it seem.
    i agree...
    with all our players back and at home we really can beat them...
    ya we really weren't at 100% that day. some things just went wrong from the beginning
     

    Alen

    Ѕenior Аdmin
    Apr 2, 2007
    54,028
    It's incredible really. They had the easiest group out there and look at the way they've qualified.
    It makes me really happy :lol:
    Eventhough for Juve it would've been better if Inter won the group because Panathinaicos could have been our opponent in the second round.

    But i'm willing to sacrifice that just to see Inter failing to win the easiest group in CL :D

    Ahhhh, how sorry i am that Werder didn't beat Anorthosis in the previous round.
     
    Status
    Not open for further replies.

    Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 37)