I wasn't, poulsen is faster and more physical with a decent passing game, overall I believe he is a better player. He's way too underrated that's why most people barely rate him.
wake up people.we have signed Poulsen because he was cheaper not because he is faster than Alonso.I don't interest what Ranieri or Gigli saying.that's the reason.
I wasn't, poulsen is faster and more physical with a decent passing game, overall I believe he is a better player. He's way too underrated that's why most people barely rate him.
I wasn't, poulsen is faster and more physical with a decent passing game, overall I believe he is a better player. He's way too underrated that's why most people barely rate him.
Define static. If you mean the rock in Liverpool's midfield who consistently performs and keeps the midfield together. Then yes, he is static. If you're trying to say that Alonso is a inconsistent performer or erratic then you are mistaken.
I wasn't, poulsen is faster and more physical with a decent passing game, overall I believe he is a better player. He's way too underrated that's why most people barely rate him.
I didn't want to spoil it for Andy especially because I am also anti-Ranieri, but it's hard to defend Poulmsen when he isn't even playing. I couldn't be more delighted when we got Poulsen over Alonso but Poulson not playing at all against Chelsea doesn't put me in a good position to argue. I expect him to leave soon for that, so show some restraint before siding with Poulman.