TWO Vital and highly significant questions:
1.) Why are we discussing Totti in the EPL thread?
2.) Why is PostIronic (ironically, an objective poster ) being a complete retard and totally subjective (and I am one biased $#@! often times) when it comes to Totti?
I explained exactly why Totti was half the player Thierry Henry was. I think it started with poking fun at the Serie A compared to the Premier League and went from there. Someone called my (obviously exaggerated) post about Henry being a million times better ridiculous, and I responded to show that in fact, Totti is nowhere near the player Henry was.
I'm the one being subjective though?

I'm the only one who brought a single objective thing into the argument, ie. statistics. I illustrated that when it counts, i.e. in Champion's League, in World Cups, against strong teams like Juve, Totti chokes. Whereas Henry was good in the big moments and has a great CL goalscoring record and same with in Euros and WCs. So please, get off the high horse with subjective stuff, everyone else was just spouting opinion.
Clearly Totti is better than Di Natale, but nowhere near as much as certain people here suggest. And to put him on par with Thierry Henry just shows how overrated the guy is by many Italian football fans. It's a fucking joke. And certainly cringeworthy.
Just one example. In Roma's 2000-01 scudetto, against the teams ranked 2-5 in the table at the end of the year, in 8 games, Totti scored 1 goal, and had no assists.
In Arsenal's invincible year 03-04, against the teams ranked 2-5 in the table at the end of the year, in 8 games, Henry scored 8 goals and had 1 assist.