Endless Summer Mercato 2016 (60 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Miki

Senior Member
Jun 18, 2008
880
Back when Danilo and Sandro both played at Porto, i really liked both players, but i like Sandro more.

If i'd have to chose, i'd want Sandro, but everyone looked at Danilo's offensive hype. SO when Madrid got Danilo (who needs to play in a team, not an individual mishmash) and he didnt rise as expected while Sandro was, offcourse i was happy, and had to explain @CrimsonianKing how i was right about Sandro.
You're saying you were rubbing his nose in it? Oh, well, if it makes you happy...

I'll repeat this. Sandro is the better player. Juventus picked the best of the two, cause madrid picked the wrong one.


Does this mean Danilo sucks? No, offcourse not. I'd gladly want him, now that we allready have Sandro. Danilo would find his greatness here again. And everyone will again think he's better cause he's offensively beasting, while i'm standing by my opinion of liking Sandro more.


@Osman , who apparently has a good memory, can testofy i've never said i didnt want Danilo. But he can assure you i greatly preferred Sandro if i have to pick 1.
The purpose of my post was only to highlight your exaggerated remarks on Isco.
MLS? It's a ridiculous thing to say and I'm sure you know it. Yet you say it anyway. And you try to sound convincing. But, hey, man, if that's your 'thing', do continue...

Now, the things you said about those two fullbacks is quite reasonable. I agree with your assessment . I can't be as certain as you that Danilo would be WC here, but I would be willing to take that risk.
 

Zacheryah

Senior Member
Aug 29, 2010
42,251
You're saying you were rubbing his nose in it? Oh, well, if it makes you happy...



The purpose of my post was only to highlight your exaggerated remarks on Isco.
MLS? It's a ridiculous thing to say and I'm sure you know it. Yet you say it anyway. And you try to sound convincing. But, hey, man, if that's your 'thing', do continue...

Now, the things you said about those two fullbacks is quite reasonable. I agree with your assessment . I can't be as certain as you that Danilo would be WC here, but I would be willing to take that risk.
Wel obviously the MLS thing was ridiculous, but i wanted to trow a stick. I dont like Isco. He's not decisive. He's flair and fancy with a shitty end product, with no character nor spine, no determination. I hate such players and love to see them obliterated against organised teams like juventus, athletico and precancershit bayern munchen.


Danilo didnt lose that offensive talent. Give him a tactical frame and team to adapt into, and he'll be the best goddam rightback you'd want.
 

Miki

Senior Member
Jun 18, 2008
880
Wel obviously the MLS thing was ridiculous, but i wanted to trow a stick. I dont like Isco. He's not decisive. He's flair and fancy with a shitty end product, with no character nor spine, no determination. I hate such players and love to see them obliterated against organised teams like juventus, athletico and precancershit bayern munchen.


Danilo didnt lose that offensive talent. Give him a tactical frame and team to adapt into, and he'll be the best goddam rightback you'd want.
Well, we mostly agree. (I wouldn't go as far as shitty end product, I can't really judge his character, nor do I see a particular lack of spine ;)) Except I wouldn't mind to see what he can do when he is playing for a team with good organization such as ours. Keep in mind that some really good players didn't show their best form while playing for Madrid. You don't need to go far back, as you yourself believe Danilo can do much better.
 

Zacheryah

Senior Member
Aug 29, 2010
42,251
We have 10 outfield players, who have great mental strenght and character, work hard, and are effective in what they do.

Playing isco, would mean the 3 cm's and the fullbacks, would get restrictions on their offensive movement to compensate for having Isco on the field, and it would limit the movement of Dybala.
 

Osman

Koul Khara!
Aug 30, 2002
61,499
Wel obviously the MLS thing was ridiculous, but i wanted to trow a stick. I dont like Isco. He's not decisive. He's flair and fancy with a shitty end product, with no character nor spine, no determination.
Playing isco, would mean the 3 cm's and the fullbacks, would get restrictions on their offensive movement to compensate for having Isco on the field, and it would limit the movement of Dybala.


uVax9q.gif













You'are just fucking blind. Sporadic playing time, change positions, very young age, but still create danger or finish things off well, assists double figures. How the fvck is this not the kind of quality we need (would be in the way of Dybala's movement takes the fucking cake :rofl: ).





- - - Updated - - -

Oh noez guise, Isco would limit Khedira's, Marchisio's and Mediocre Pogba replacement's offensive movement.

giphy.gif


It really takes the fucking cake :rofl:
 

Post Ironic

Senior Member
Feb 9, 2013
42,253
Back when Danilo and Sandro both played at Porto, i really liked both players, but i like Sandro more.

If i'd have to chose, i'd want Sandro, but everyone looked at Danilo's offensive hype. SO when Madrid got Danilo (who needs to play in a team, not an individual mishmash) and he didnt rise as expected while Sandro was, offcourse i was happy, and had to explain @CrimsonianKing how i was right about Sandro.

I'll repeat this. Sandro is the better player. Juventus picked the best of the two, cause madrid picked the wrong one.


Does this mean Danilo sucks? No, offcourse not. I'd gladly want him, now that we allready have Sandro. Danilo would find his greatness here again. And everyone will again think he's better cause he's offensively beasting, while i'm standing by my opinion of liking Sandro more.


@Osman , who apparently has a good memory, can testofy i've never said i didnt want Danilo. But he can assure you i greatly preferred Sandro if i have to pick 1.
C'mon Zach. This is silly. Madrid was not looking for a LB, they have Marcelo there already. They were looking for a RB, so they scooped Danilo, the best one available.

It's not Madrid picking wrong and Juve picking right... it's both teams picking the player for the position they required reinforcement for at the time.

I'd also say there's very little to differentiate between the two in terms of quality. Danilo went to a Madrid in chaos, a Madrid that until a few weeks ago was still in chaos. Under Zidane he looks pretty damn good again.

Alex Sandro didn't really start featuring for Juve until our chaotic spell ended. And he's still not entirely Allegri's first choice.

Both fantastic players, I see little that illustrates one is clearly better than the other at this point in time.
 

Zacheryah

Senior Member
Aug 29, 2010
42,251
Its okay if you like players that dont fit into juventus. You like alot of teams, so i see no issue.


Its okay if you think Isco is good at other teams. He probably is.


Not at juventus tho. And he'll never come here because of that. Never.
Gotto love our great management.
 

Zacheryah

Senior Member
Aug 29, 2010
42,251
C'mon Zach. This is silly. Madrid was not looking for a LB, they have Marcelo there already. They were looking for a RB, so they scooped Danilo, the best one available.

It's not Madrid picking wrong and Juve picking right... it's both teams picking the player for the position they required reinforcement for at the time.

I'd also say there's very little to differentiate between the two in terms of quality. Danilo went to a Madrid in chaos, a Madrid that until a few weeks ago was still in chaos. Under Zidane he looks pretty damn good again.

Alex Sandro didn't really start featuring for Juve until our chaotic spell ended. And he's still not entirely Allegri's first choice.

Both fantastic players, I see little that illustrates one is clearly better than the other at this point in time.
Since when does madrid remotely care about the players they have when they see something shining new ? They picked the most fancy of the two. If their natural flanks would be swapped, they'd still pick Danilo.

Sandro is just better. Half this forum is drunken mad at Allegri for the amount of times he benches Sandro for Evra, considering how blistering amazing Sandro has consistantly been when he did play. Everyone can tell you about that magical connection he and pogba have, and how we lack something up front when he's not playing.

Danilo isnt remotely as good as he can be. He's sinking with the team against any opponent that isnt shit. Thats not how Porto's Danilo was. The Danilo that with Sandro absolutely demolished bayern at home before both getting suspended.

I know we cant, but Danilo&Sandro in the same team, having improved with age, would be fucking amazing. 3-5-2 sandro danilo. If anyone calls that boring they should get a vasectomy cause that amount of peasant filth shouldnt breed
 

Fr3sh

Senior Member
Jul 12, 2011
37,254
Lets go for

Keep lemina and Pogba

Get Benatia, Danilo

IF morata is abducted, get cavani

done
Perfect mercato right here!!
Cavani comes regardless of Morata though!

- - - Updated - - -

You litterally spent solid week on this forum talking shit about Danilo in effort to talk up Sandro quite unnecessarily, and now you want him in Juve.
:lol:

- - - Updated - - -

Gattuso Pirlo Seedoft
Kaka

Khedira Marchisio Pogba
Oscar
:rofl:
 

Fr3sh

Senior Member
Jul 12, 2011
37,254
mediocre skill show

pereyra tier

Guy looks so heavy on the ball. I used to be a fan of him once but he didn't develop for shit. We need all flair and fancy we can get but Oscar isn't the guy to deliver it
:tup:

Was very fond of him too in the past. I'd rather Matic from Chelsea's midfield over this guy.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 56)