Emre Can (17 Viewers)

[alexjuventino]

I still can't believe he has a release clause. Terrible decision.

It's a 50m release clause in his last year of his contract, how is that bad?

 

Buy on AliExpress.com

[ßöмßäяðîëя]

He signed a four-year deal, release clause kicks in at the start of the third year.

 

[DAiDEViL]

It's a 50m release clause in his last year of his contract, how is that bad?

It isn't.

 

[alexjuventino]

He signed a four-year deal, release clause kicks in at the start of the third year.

Ah yes, my mistake, however it still isn't nearly as bad as some make it out to be. And if he extends Juve renegotiate the clause.

- - - Updated - - -

It isn't.

Yea but you hate him

 

[WΏΏdy?]

I know, but I'm certain Liverpool could have paid him.

I wonder why he left. He loves Klopp, at least I thought he did.

Gotta ask @Enron

I still can't believe he has a release clause. Terrible decision.

Yep, I don't mind the 16mil we paid but that release clause is shit, we gona give him playing time to develop and he eats bentancur playing time, if he explodes someone comes in and buys him for cheap, if he flops then we have a flop on our hands.

 

[DAiDEViL]

Yea but you hate him

I hate his wages and the €16m agent fee.

But yeah, if a club is willing to spend €50m on an Emre Can with only one year left on his contract - let them have him.

 

[Juliano13]

The problem is the precedent it creates. We've never had a release clause before.

 

[X Æ A-12]

Pretty sure, if he is worthwhile, he will have signed new contract by then for larger wage and no release clause.

 

[zizinho]

Pretty sure, if he is worthwhile, he will have signed new contract by then for larger wage and no release clause.

he already has 5M, if he wants more he can go look for it in China

 

[alexjuventino]

I hate his wages and the €16m agent fee.

But yeah, if a club is willing to spend €50m on an Emre Can with only one year left on his contract - let them have him.

Fair enough and agree with the last part

The problem is the precedent it creates. We've never had a release clause before.

It doesn't create a problem, as shown but the management so far. If someone doesn't want to stay or is an issue, we let them leave.

Pretty sure, if he is worthwhile, he will have signed new contract by then for larger wage and no release clause.

Exactly

 

[X Æ A-12]

he already has 5M, if he wants more he can go look for it in China

You mad that he is competition for Pjanic?

- - - Updated - - -

It doesn't create a problem, as shown but the management so far. If someone doesn't want to stay or is an issue, we let them leave.

True, we always sell players who want to leave anyway so release clause is really not much of a departure from that.

Good point

 

[ßöмßäяðîëя]

The problem is the precedent it creates. We've never had a release clause before.

The precedent it creates?

What is wrong with a release clause? It's 50M Euros, dude, what do you think he's actually worth?

 

[zizinho]

You mad that he is competition for Pjanic?

silly Kyle, they dont play the same position

 

[X Æ A-12]

silly Kyle, they dont play the same position

i bet you are telling yourself that every time you open thread

 

[ßöмßäяðîëя]

It doesn't create a problem, as shown but the management so far. If someone doesn't want to stay or is an issue, we let them leave.

Exactly, no one stays if he doesn't want to. They stop showing up for training, they don't give their all, they start rifts in the dressing room, it's just bad.

The entire point of a contract is it's beneficial to both sides, when it stops being beneficial to either side, it stops being a contract.

We see this in business all the time, if one side wants out, you find a way out.

 

[zizinho]

i bet you are telling yourself that every time you open thread

silly Kyle

 

[alexjuventino]

Exactly, no one stays if he doesn't want to. They stop showing up for training, they don't give their all, they start rifts in the dressing room, it's just bad.

The entire point of a contract is it's beneficial to both sides, when it stops being beneficial to either side, it stops being a contract.

We see this in business all the time, if one side wants out, you find a way out.

Yep and Juve follow this model and Don't let emotion or anything interfere. If we lose him in the future, we lose him. The club is bigger than the player and exactly like you said, if the contract doesn't benefit both parties, then their won't be an agreement or their will be a rift.

 

[ßöмßäяðîëя]

silly Kyle

Every time you say this, I just imagine it coming out of Ike's mouth.

- - - Updated - - -

Yep and Juve follow this model and Don't let emotion or anything interfere. If we lose him in the future, we lose him. The club is bigger than the player and exactly like you said, if the contract doesn't benefit both parties, then their won't be an agreement or their will be a rift.

Exactly, that's how business is done.

You either want to be here or you don't, if you don't, that's fine, but get out so we can move on. It's like a girlfriend, if you want to be with me, cool, but if you don't just get out of here so I can find other bitches to make look like the Phantom of the Opera.

 

[alexjuventino]

Every time you say this, I just imagine it coming out of Ike's mouth.

- - - Updated - - -


Exactly, that's how business is done.

You either want to be here or you don't, if you don't, that's fine, but get out so we can move on. It's like a girlfriend, if you want to be with me, cool, but if you don't just get out of here so I can find other bitches to make look like the Phantom of the Opera.

You lost be at the bold part

 

[ßöмßäяðîëя]

Hey man, blowing backs out is what I'm about.