Edin Džeko - Striker - Manchester City - Part 2 (31 Viewers)

[Bianconero81]

I'm not insisting on it. I'm just saying it could potentially work. Why do you have to be so old fashioned in your approach to football? Is Ronaldo a CF? Is Rooney a true CF? Barcelona don't really play with a defined CF, and yet all 3 teams seem to do well, and bang in the goals. Jovetic and Vucinic would ooze creativity, create tons of opportunities, and I'm sure with Vucinic being deployed in a more advanced role, he'd score more goals. Moreover, we can have Matri or Pazzini coming off the bench to complement our attack, if they are needed. I feel that particularly in the CL, where teams are more technical, and the pace of the game is faster, a technical duo of Vucinic and Jovetic, and even someone like Giovinco, will cause the opponents far more problems than a traditional CF, unless we are talking about someone like Cavani or Higuain.

Jovetic has 9 goals in 20 appearances for his country, while Vucinic has 12 in 29.

 

Buy on AliExpress.com

[alexjuventino]

I'm not insisting on it. I'm just saying it could potentially work. Why do you have to be so old fashioned in your approach to football? Is Ronaldo a CF? Is Rooney a true CF? Barcelona don't really play with a defined CF, and yet all 3 teams seem to do well, and bang in the goals. Jovetic and Vucinic would ooze creativity, create tons of opportunities, and I'm sure with Vucinic being deployed in a more advanced role, he'd score more goals. Moreover, we can have Matri or Pazzini coming off the bench to complement our attack, if they are needed. I feel that particularly in the CL, where teams are more technical, and the pace of the game is faster, a technical duo of Vucinic and Jovetic, and even someone like Giovinco, will cause the opponents far more problems than a traditional CF, unless we are talking about someone like Cavani or Higuain.

Jovetic has 9 goals in 20 appearances for his country, while Vucinic has 12 in 29.

Yes they will create chances but juventus dont need chances they need a finisher, they more then enough chances. If we are going to have vucinic-jovetic/giovinco in the same line up i think u would have to play a 3 man frontline of vucinic-matti-giovinco/jovetic. Also with that being said Pirlo is juventus target man. If you have a starting line up with 3 play makers who do they target? The midfielders? You can keep saying that you want jovetic but we dont need him. If we get jovetic then the smartest thig would be to keep matri. Also vucinic isnt exactly the best finisher. He can score but he should not be the target man

 

[Zacheryah]

if we play 3-5-2 and it looks like it

pazzini with vucinic or jovetic


will outscore vucinic and jovetic


mark my words

 

[Hust]

We should loan Dzeko with option to send him back if Hustini talks too much.

 

[Fake Melo]

 

[Hust]

if we play 3-5-2 and it looks like it

pazzini with vucinic or jovetic


will outscore vucinic and jovetic


mark my words

Dzeko - Jovetic would be even better.

---------- Post added 05.08.2012 at 19:15 ----------

 

[alexjuventino]

Matri-Giovinco>Pazzini-Jovetic

 

[Hust]

Well there is a bold statement if I ever saw one.

 

[Maddy]

Matri-Giovinco>Pazzini-Jovetic

Ugh. That's putting a lot into the wee man.

 

[Red]

Matri-Giovinco>Pazzini-Jovetic

I wouldn't agree with that, but I would certainly listen to arguments that Jovetic just wouldn't provide enough of an improvement to make it worth shelling out 25m+ on him.

 

[alexjuventino]

I wouldn't agree with that, but I would certainly listen to arguments that Jovetic just wouldn't provide enough of an improvement to make it worth shelling out 25m+ on him.

Why dont you agree with it? also if we are going to spend 30m for another ss we should just buy another felipe melo, amauri or diego

 

[Kasaki]

We should just get Jovetic. No one is in for him, the risk of missing out on him is minimal, and he will be world class within a year or two. If City don't intend to sell Dzeko, and RVP isn't going anywhere, we shouldn't delay and procrastinate when getting Jovetic. Jovetic and Pazzini is better than not getting anyone at all, and being stuck with our rather average attack.

If after his CL season no one was after him I'm sure he'll be avail in another year

 

[KB824]

If after his CL season no one was after him I'm sure he'll be avail in another year

What????


Teams were after him. HE then tore his knee up in preseason and missed the year

 

[Zacheryah]

Dzeko - Jovetic would be even better.

---------- Post added 05.08.2012 at 19:15 ----------

Higuain>dzeko>pazzini in that regard

sadly higuain was never an option, and if rvp doesnt move to city, neighter is dzeko


and people, stop overrating giovinco plz

 

[RAVANELLI]

Getting JoJo right now is just a luxury, I wouldn't mind but not on the expense of other priorities, IMHFO.

 

[Red]

Why dont you agree with it?

Because I think that Jovetic is better than Giovinco and that Pazzini is better than Matri.

 

[Van Helsing]

Because I think that Jovetic is better than Giovinco and that Pazzini is better than Matri.

so true but this never changes our words.

fuck pazzini!

 

[dann10]

So in all honesty, you guys think dzeko has a bigger chance of joining milan or us? He's mentioned milan in a couple recent interviews

 

[Bianconero81]

Matri-Giovinco>Pazzini-Jovetic

Give me some of them dream pills

 

[RAVANELLI]

So in all honesty, you guys think dzeko has a bigger chance of joining milan or us? He's mentioned milan in a couple recent interviews

I think Milan is closer than us.
Add the fact that he is a Milan fan.