Dušan Vlahović (49 Viewers)
- Thread starter Dostoevsky
- Start date
- Tags ilfjeatthis
unfortunately he is still not lethal and doesnt bring what a good striker should bring to team - at least in the domestic league.
Scored 2 non penalty goals in the league with his non penalty xGoals stat 3.2 - meaning he should still score more.
So its:
2 G with 3.2 xG =-1.2 G
Here are other strikers in the league (non penalty goals and xG stat with out penalties - same as Vlaho)
7 G with 2.6 xG= +4.4 Thuram - that is of course great and probably not possible to keep it in the long term.
5 G with 3.6 xG= +1.4 Retegui
4 G with 1.7 xG= +2.3 Cutrone
3 G with 3.3 xG= -0.3 Dovbyk - the closest to Vlaho
3 G with 1.7 xG= +1.3 Dia
3 G with 1.9 xG= +1.1 TengStedt
at the moment, he is by far the least lethal striker from the best goalscorers.
- - - Updated - - -
also on the argument Juve is not creating chances for him - its not valid - he would have low xG stat if that was the case, while only Dovbyk and Retegui has higher xG than him
Scored 2 non penalty goals in the league with his non penalty xGoals stat 3.2 - meaning he should still score more.
So its:
2 G with 3.2 xG =-1.2 G
Here are other strikers in the league (non penalty goals and xG stat with out penalties - same as Vlaho)
7 G with 2.6 xG= +4.4 Thuram - that is of course great and probably not possible to keep it in the long term.
5 G with 3.6 xG= +1.4 Retegui
4 G with 1.7 xG= +2.3 Cutrone
3 G with 3.3 xG= -0.3 Dovbyk - the closest to Vlaho
3 G with 1.7 xG= +1.3 Dia
3 G with 1.9 xG= +1.1 TengStedt
at the moment, he is by far the least lethal striker from the best goalscorers.
- - - Updated - - -
also on the argument Juve is not creating chances for him - its not valid - he would have low xG stat if that was the case, while only Dovbyk and Retegui has higher xG than him
xG:
"Expected goal assigns a value to each shot between 0.00 and 1.00 to reflect the probability that it will result in a goal. A shot that measures 0.01 xG suggests it could reasonably be expected to result in a goal one in 100 times"
While I don't find it as accurate as it only counts shots, so for example if we put a striker in a good chance, but he fucks it up because of his heavy first touch and won't get to shot then it won't be reflected in xG Stat. So it can basically only show the quality of the shots he is putting, not the overall gameplay.
"Expected goal assigns a value to each shot between 0.00 and 1.00 to reflect the probability that it will result in a goal. A shot that measures 0.01 xG suggests it could reasonably be expected to result in a goal one in 100 times"
While I don't find it as accurate as it only counts shots, so for example if we put a striker in a good chance, but he fucks it up because of his heavy first touch and won't get to shot then it won't be reflected in xG Stat. So it can basically only show the quality of the shots he is putting, not the overall gameplay.
