Do you agree with banning high altitude stadia? (1 Viewer)

Do you agree with banning high altitude stadia?

  • Yes

  • No

  • I don't Care


Results are only viewable after voting.

ReBeL

The Jackal
Jan 14, 2005
22,870
#1
FIFA has been urged to reconsider its ban on international matches played at stadia like La Paz in Bolivia situated over 2500m above sea level.
World football’s governing body introduced the new ruling on Sunday citing its wish to better protect players’ health.

But its decision has stirred up a storm in Latin America led by Evo Morales, the president of Bolivia, who has called on FIFA to shelve the idea.
Morales said: “This ban disciminates against the legitimate right of people to play football and ignores the principle of egality and universality inscribed in the Declaration of Human Rights by the United Nations.”

The Bolivia president said he would be contacting other countries and cities affected by the ban to form a unified opposition to the ruling and is planning to hold a meeting in La Paz to discuss further action.

“We will be calling on our fellow presidents from Argentina, Brazil and other Latin American countries who are opposed to this decision so as to take into account those people who live at high altitude and who will find themselves excluded from playing sport.” FIFA, outlining its reasons for the controversial new legislation, issued a statement Sunday explaining: “For medical reasons and so to better protect the players the executive committee has decided that from now international games at over 2500m altitude will be banned.”

South American delegates in at FIFA’s meeting in Zurich at the weekend suggested FIFA would be prepared to reconsider the ruling if it received a formal request to do so from the continent’s football federation, Conmebol.

Apart from the Bolivian capital which lies 3600m above sea level the ban will also cover the Colombian capital Bogota (2600m) and Quito (2800m) in Ecuador. Mexico City, which hosted the 1970 and 1986 World Cup finals, can consider itself fortunate however as it narrowly escapes the ruling lying at an altitude of 2240m.

AFP
 

Buy on AliExpress.com

Martin

Senior Member
Dec 31, 2000
56,913
#4
It makes sense that matches have to be played under certain set conditions. Frankly don't know what it's like to play at 2500m height, so I'm not one to say whether this should or shouldn't be done.
 
OP

ReBeL

The Jackal
Jan 14, 2005
22,870
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #5
    It makes sense that matches have to be played under certain set conditions. Frankly don't know what it's like to play at 2500m height, so I'm not one to say whether this should or shouldn't be done.
    But Martin, it's not the fault of Bolivians that their country is so high. Why not making such a similar step on the always snowy countries or the very hot countries?
     

    Martin

    Senior Member
    Dec 31, 2000
    56,913
    #7
    But Martin, it's not the fault of Bolivians that their country is so high. Why not making such a similar step on the always snowy countries or the very hot countries?
    That would also make sense, at least for some types of fixtures (like internationals). Playing in snow[fall] is not exactly what football is all about. And while teams that live in such climates deserve credit for overcoming those barriers, it's more of a Harlem Globetrotters achievement. Yes, it's nice that you can do that, but that's not really what we're here for.

    Heck, in 1997 I watched Real Madrid lose 2-0 in Norway as it was snowing and I can tell you right now that I didn't feel like I was getting my money's worth for that ticket, that wasn't the proper Real Madrid.


    Just in the same way, you're not supposed to play official matches in a pool of water (like Perugia '00 lol), it makes sense to regulate the conditions somewhat.
     

    swag

    L'autista
    Administrator
    Sep 23, 2003
    84,960
    #8
    As I said elsewhere, Nepal would be banned from hosting any home games, practically. And they don't even field Totti nor a bunch of fans who throw batteries and flares at the refs. What kind of justice is that?

    And when do we relax these rules when global warming puts half of these sea-level countries underwater and Quito is suddenly at a mere 2,000 meters high? :D

    Blatter apparently got bored writing missives about female soccer players wearing short-shorts and has moved on to even more urgent matters.
     

    Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)