Diego Ribas da Cunha (35 Viewers)

Seven

In bocca al lupo, Fabio.
Jun 25, 2003
39,344
No, he shouldn't. The folks that should shut the fuck up are those that said Diego would never be sold. They are the true idiots of this forum and should off themselves immediately.

Then you have other idiots who said that he would never be sold, but then when he was, they immediately turned on the player. They aren't even worth a response. Their idiocy speaks for itself.
Turned on the player? Not quite. But you are missing the fact that Diego accepted Wolfsburg's offer and that he is making more money over there. And acting as if Diego's part of Juventus history is a bit much IMHO. The guy did virtually nothing here. Could have been a very good player for us this year, but they decided to sell him. I'm okay with that. The only thing that bothers me is the price.
 

JCK

Biased
JCK
May 11, 2004
125,390
He should, it's pointless him coming out to the media moaning about things. He should move on and understand Juventus did not want him.

Has Marotta or Del Neri come out to the media saying anything about him? No.

He should just concentrate on Wolfsburg and just understand he is not part of our future.
Sour grapes, Nick. That's the only explanation.
 

Cronios

Juventolog
Jun 7, 2004
27,519
Did the idea that we paid double his value last season occur to you? I don't think so because if it did, you would not have whining material.
double???
NO, at any case, we paid double for melo and bonucci, but not for diego.
Talents like that have international value and the potential to become world class. Thats why they cost +21mil, when limited players like quaq only cost about 15mil
There a difference of an entire class there!
Diego should cost 20mil at least, 25 after a good season with us!
 

Paolo Rossi

World Champion
Jul 8, 2007
285
Ok, so is Quagliarella IT????????

I thought we were getting someone nig to replace him. I thought for sure that that Cassano was at least coming here. This sux :(

I like Quagliarella, but we needed something more. Well, 2 days left to find out exactly what's going on.
 

giovanotti

ONE MAN ARMY
Aug 13, 2004
13,725
double???
NO, at any case, we paid double for melo and bonucci, but not for diego.
Talents like that have international value and the potential to become world class. Thats why they cost +21mil, when limited players like quaq only cost about 15mil
There a difference of an entire class there!
Diego should cost 20mil at least, 25 after a good season with us!
I agree here.
 

Fint

Senior Member
Aug 13, 2010
19,354
I wonder? If there is an agreement in place with regards to first choice on Dzeko as part of the Diego deal, would there be any restraint on Marotta revealing the stipulation of the transfer?

The fact that we sold Diego and didn't replace him with a top class striker like Pazzini (a clear favourite of Del Neri & Marotta) preferring to just loan Quagliarella, would possibly suggest that Dzeko could well be on his way next summer.

The fact that we seemed to reopen negotiations with Wolfsburg for the sale of Diego could indicate that Marotta did perhaps propose such a deal having first had the supposed 30 million offer rejected.

All theory of course but who knows?
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 33)