Datasport Top 20 Players (1 Viewer)

[Ali]

Are we that mediocre??? No one above 7 .... :down:

 

Buy on AliExpress.com

[Layce Erayce]

its avg'd out so i dont mind

 

[Ali]

But still we should have at least 4 players in the 7 zone ...

 

[Layce Erayce]

IMHO there ranking are crap.

 

[Ali]

Why do they insist on giving players such a low rank anyway. OK don't go over the moon with 9's & 10's but please reward a players hard work. What's the use of 8,9 & 10 if no player will touch that zone?

 

[Layce Erayce]

well i agree. sometimes players need an 8 or nine.

 

[Ian]

++ [ originally posted by DaJuve ] ++
Why do they insist on giving players such a low rank anyway. OK don't go over the moon with 9's & 10's but please reward a players hard work. What's the use of 8,9 & 10 if no player will touch that zone?

8,9,10 are reserved for the winners when they publish the year-long's at the end of the season. That way, they make it look like they are always right about who is playing the best.

 

[Jun-hide]

The markings are relative, so whether player get seven, eight, or nine, it doesn't matter too much to me..
Beside, I think Italian journalist are too "harsh" and "perfectionist".

 

[Martin]

++ [ originally posted by DaJuve ] ++
Why do they insist on giving players such a low rank anyway. OK don't go over the moon with 9's & 10's but please reward a players hard work. What's the use of 8,9 & 10 if no player will touch that zone?

That's exactly how it works, 4 is the bottom limit, 8 is the absolute top. I've seen Zidane get a 10 twice but that is so rare you see it a handful of times a season if at all.

 

[Desmond]

++ [ originally posted by Alex ] ++


That's exactly how it works, 4 is the bottom limit, 8 is the absolute top. I've seen Zidane get a 10 twice but that is so rare you see it a handful of times a season if at all.

either that or the hournalist is a real fan

 

[Ali]

++ [ originally posted by Rickenbacker2 ] ++
8,9,10 are reserved for the winners when they publish the year-long's at the end of the season. That way, they make it look like they are always right about who is playing the best.

I thought they would use the averages to award the players at the end of the season.

++ [ originally posted by Alex ] ++
That's exactly how it works, 4 is the bottom limit, 8 is the absolute top. I've seen Zidane get a 10 twice but that is so rare you see it a handful of times a season if at all.

Not very helpful. We need realistic ratings.

 

[Ian]

++ [ originally posted by DaJuve ] ++
I thought they would use the averages to award the players at the end of the season.

That's what they want you to think.

 

[Dj Juve]

and it's all a conspiracy rite?

 

[Desmond]

exactly.like ian said,they want to make it seem that they're right about whoever they're giving the awards to, so......

 

[Glen]

What on earth are you guys talking about?

Are you complaining that we haven't got anyone with an AVERAGE rating above 7? When there's not a single player in the league with such a rating?

And what's with the talk about the ratings being sort of a hoax at seasons end?

Datasport will give it's awards to the average leaders of their various categories. They always do.

The top 20 is only based on Datasport's own votes; just like Gazzetta Dello Sport have their rankings that are quite far from looking like Datasport's by the way, yet of course with many of the same players in the top zone.

The perhaps less suspect rankings are to be found at Datasport.it though, under 'Pagelle' where all the major papers ratings are used to make the average- not just their own. When you look at the ratings at the site teamwise however- they do use their own.

But maybe I missed some punchlines here and you all knew this in advance . I just don't understand the conversation in this tread .

Ciao.

 

[Respaul]

Gazzetta's top ratings so far:



Totti Roma CEN 6.65

Nedved Juventus CEN 6.64

Maldini Milan DIF 6.64

Mutu Parma ATT 6.61

Del Piero Juventus ATT 6.53

Lopez Lazio ATT 6.52

Stankovic Lazio CEN 6.5

Vieri Inter ATT 6.47

Appiah Brescia CEN 6.45

 

[Ian]

++ [ originally posted by Glen ] ++
But maybe I missed some punchlines here and you all knew this in advance . I just don't understand the conversation in this tread .

Ciao.

Well, my ascertion about the conspiracy was mostly conjecture and conspiracy theory humour for those who are wise to it.

 

[Doremon]

My top 20 is Def: Buffon,Thuram,Maldini,Ferrara,Kaladze Midi Natale,Appiah,Zambrotta,Nedved Att:Mutu,Di Vaio/Miccoli/Del Piero

 

[gigi's twin]

++ [ originally posted by Shadowfax ] ++
Gazzetta's top ratings so far:



Totti Roma CEN 6.65

Nedved Juventus CEN 6.64

Maldini Milan DIF 6.64

Mutu Parma ATT 6.61

Del Piero Juventus ATT 6.53

Lopez Lazio ATT 6.52

Stankovic Lazio CEN 6.5

Vieri Inter ATT 6.47

Appiah Brescia CEN 6.45

Totti is better than Neddy????? Where did they put their eyes?

Btw, I like your avatar!:thumb: