Cristian Molinaro (20 Viewers)

[dogsarecute]

Domenico WANTED Juventus. Mofo Ranieri (on behalf of JUVENTUS and BODs ) DIDN'T want Criscito.

Then Genoa EXPRESS desire to take him and they RESPECT him, BELIEVE in him. Juventus BELIEVE in a retard called Molinaro.

I don't see how Domenico should rot on the bench just so he can wear Juventus' jersey. He is an able footballer with talent. Molinaro is NOT a football player, just a headless chicken.

I'm guessing ur next line of argument might be : Criscito didn't perform or sumthing along those lines.

Wow you can predict the future and Criscito didn't perform when he was on the first-team. He was owned by Totti and almost everyone then suggested that he should go bulk up or go on loan for experience. He was then tried on the left-back slot a few games later and managed to perform even worse than you know who so he was sent on loan. I am highly sceptical that you are amongst the few who wanted to give him more chances then.

 

Buy on AliExpress.com

[Raj007]

Any left back will struggle with no help whatsoever.

Dude WTF are u talkin abt ??? Did Maldini struggle when he played for NT ??? Or Zambrotta / Pessoto ???

Ok maybe that Maldini comparison is bit overdrawn, but the whole idea of a player being bad WITHOUT help is retarded.

 

[Raj007]

Wow you can predict the future and Criscito didn't perform when he was on the first-team. He was owned by Totti and almost everyone then suggested that he should go bulk up or go on loan for experience. He was then tried on the left-back slot a few games later and managed to perform even worse than you know who so he was sent on loan. I am highly sceptical that you are amongst the few who wanted to give him more chances then.

That "Totti game" was the ONLY game he got, he didn't feature regularly in Serie B and neither did he get continuous stretch of matches to show his skills.

I AM one of the players who has seen De Ceglie struggle in the LB position, yet want him to stay and play more. Because Molinaro got this far with Juventus only because Ranieri had a BONER for him (and Marchionni, I guess). THAT'S IT, I cannot foresee any other reason whatsoever.

Molinaro SUCKING for so many years now yet getting guaranteed starting place and Domenico being shipped out at the first sight of a bad performance (against a WC player).

WoW, I'm sorry but that's RETARDED. And any1 who argues OTHERWISE is ALSO A RETARD.

 

[dao_nq]

Que sera sera, if Moli played like last season, we'd have no excuse for him any more. That's all

 

[Ahmed]

if Moli performs like last season, then we won't need to worry about the LB position

 

[dogsarecute]

That "Totti game" was the ONLY game he got, he didn't feature regularly in Serie B and neither did he get continuous stretch of matches to show his skills.

I AM one of the players who has seen De Ceglie struggle in the LB position, yet want him to stay and play more. Because Molinaro got this far with Juventus only because Ranieri had a BONER for him (and Marchionni, I guess). THAT'S IT, I cannot foresee any other reason whatsoever.

Molinaro SUCKING for so many years now yet getting guaranteed starting place and Domenico being shipped out at the first sight of a bad performance (against a WC player).

WoW, I'm sorry but that's RETARDED. And any1 who argues OTHERWISE is ALSO A RETARD.

You must have not seen the start of the season because Criscito and Andrade were the starting pair so that could not possibly be his first Serie A match. His previous matches, if I recall, were okay but not outstanding. Molinaro was not shipped out because he was the only true substitute for Chiellini(discounting Grygera and Sali who can play in multiple positions). Criscito was brought in as a centre-back and not a left-back. It was Genoa that shaped him into a left sided player.

 

[dogsarecute]

if Moli performs like last season, then we won't need to worry about the LB position

As a substitute and in big matches? Possibly.

 

[Bjerknes]

You must have not seen the start of the season because Criscito and Andrade were the starting pair so that could not possibly be his first Serie A match. His previous matches, if I recall, were okay but not outstanding. Molinaro was not shipped out because he was the only true substitute for Chiellini(discounting Grygera and Sali who can play in multiple positions). Criscito was brought in as a centre-back and not a left-back. It was Genoa that shaped him into a left sided player.

Ugh.

Please do us all a favor and watch Juventus a bit more. I know Manure playing is tempting because you're a fan and all, but we should be pretty good this year.

Molinaro was not 'OK' during his first season, he was absolutely terrible, and he was not good enough for us last season either. Especially if you factor in the Nedved effect.

Stop posting lies or move on to the MUTV forum PLEASE.

 

[Raj007]

You must have not seen the start of the season because Criscito and Andrade were the starting pair so that could not possibly be his first Serie A match. His previous matches, if I recall, were okay but not outstanding. Molinaro was not shipped out because he was the only true substitute for Chiellini(discounting Grygera and Sali who can play in multiple positions). Criscito was brought in as a centre-back and not a left-back. It was Genoa that shaped him into a left sided player.

Look all I'm saying that Molinaro has been the 1st choice LB for us for a good part of 2 years.

How many MATCHES has Criscito played for us, irrespective of whether he played as a CB / LB or a starter / sub ???

Confidence building takes time, no one is Maldini to be able to adapt to Serie A since day 1.

I want him back and Molinaro HAS to go. I don't care where, I'll pay one month's salary to ship him out if that is what is needed.

Criscito = talent and definitely Juventus material

Molinaro = EPL material.

Enuff said !!

 

[Raj007]

As a substitute and in big matches? Possibly.

We have enuff Primavera players who are motivated and definitely talented, wanting to play for Juventus. Molinaro is basically DOING SHIT and yet he's playing day-in day-out for us.

Oh and if u're a Manure fan and THEN a Juve fan then, please let the Juve fans worry abt this SHIT. You can worry abt ur Evras and Sheas all u want.

 

[Bjerknes]

Because Molinaro got this far with Juventus only because Ranieri had a BONER for him (and Marchionni, I guess). THAT'S IT, I cannot foresee any other reason whatsoever.

Molinaro SUCKING for so many years now yet getting guaranteed starting place and Domenico being shipped out at the first sight of a bad performance (against a WC player).

This is truly the issue here. Molinaro receives a free ride for some reason, no matter what he does, and is rewarded with more chances to prove himself. Then you have people on here defending the decision by saying "he's improving." Meanwhile, some players have one good match along with a couple bad ones, and they're automatically shipped out.

This is something called double standards. It's happened with Criscito, it's happened with Tiago, it's happened with others and will occur again. Is it that difficult to keep some sort of standard when it comes to these players?

Molinaro has never proven himself in the past that he's a capable player, so basically he's unproven yet still receives a full ride. Something is wrong here.

 

[Amaurisimo]

Molinaro could be worst FB in league but until Sissoko got injured we had best defense in serie a and CL..
Team work is very important

 

[Bjerknes]

Molinaro could be worst FB in league but until Sissoko got injured we had best defense in serie a and CL..
Team work is very important

Especially for Molinaro, considering his only talent is relying on teammates for help.

 

[Amaurisimo]

This is truly the issue here. Molinaro receives a free ride for some reason, no matter what he does, and is rewarded with more chances to prove himself. Then you have people on here defending the decision by saying "he's improving." Meanwhile, some players have one good match along with a couple bad ones, and they're automatically shipped out.

This is something called double standards. It's happened with Criscito, it's happened with Tiago, it's happened with others and will occur again. Is it that difficult to keep some sort of standard when it comes to these players?

Molinaro has never proven himself in the past that he's a capable player, so basically he's unproven yet still receives a full ride. Something is wrong here.

It happened with Tiago??
How many chances he had before? Maybe you meant, he had so many chances and should be kicked out before!?

Maybe Nocerino is other one???
I think Alen explained you this one as well..

Can we start blaming players for a change?

 

[Amaurisimo]

Especially for Molinaro, considering his only talent is relying on teammates for help.

so we are that good that we can play even without him than ???

 

[Bjerknes]

It happened with Tiago??
How many chances he had before? Maybe you meant, he had so many chances and should be kicked out before!?

Maybe Nocerino is other one???
I think Alen explained you this one as well..

Can we start blaming players for a change?

It's this simple: Molinaro plays every match, isn't good enough at least 75% of the time.

Tiago probably has the same percentage of successful matches, but the difference under Ranieri is that he'd be benched after his matches.

So what we have is that Moli started no matter what and Tiago was benched no matter what after his performances.

There's no two ways about it. This is what one calls double standards in player selections.

The only reason why Moli gets any defense is because people like Ranieri, the fact that he tries hard, and this supposed improvement in his game over the past year, something that isn't anything meaningful IMO.

 

[Bjerknes]

so we are that good that we can play even without him than ???

You can throw me in there and we'd still do better than playing a man down, just because extra bodies help out defensively.

Doesn't mean I should play though.

 

[Quetzalcoatl]

...

Learn to use multiquote.

 

[Amaurisimo]

It's this simple: Molinaro plays every match, isn't good enough at least 75% of the time.

Tiago probably has the same percentage of successful matches, but the difference under Ranieri is that he'd be benched after his matches.

So what we have is that Moli started no matter what and Tiago was benched no matter what after his performances.

There's no two ways about it. This is what one calls double standards in player selections.

The only reason why Moli gets any defense is because people like Ranieri, the fact that he tries hard, and this supposed improvement in his game over the past year, something that isn't anything meaningful IMO.

It is nothing to do with Ranieri

We dont have anyone else as "good/bad" as Molinaro to play LB while we have plenty in the midfield, but also with our 442 - which was at that time more appropriate, we could not utilise Tiago better, so he sucked when he played.

As simple as that..

 

[Bjerknes]

It is nothing to do with Ranieri

We dont have anyone else as "good/bad" as Molinaro to play LB while we have plenty in the midfield, but also with our 442 - which was at that time more appropriate, we could not utilise Tiago better, so he sucked when he played.

As simple as that..

De Ceglie didn't get much time to prove himself, Hasan didn't get much time to prove himself out there, yet Moli was always started without any checks and balances.

As bad as that douchebag was, he should have sat on the bench for multiple matches so that we could have seen the others play.

But it is indeed Ranieri's and the management's fault for not bringing anybody better or anybody else for that position.