++ [ originally posted by Sunshine ] ++
OK, you guys have killed me on this multiple light source thing :LOL: I surrender
But abt Gray's "dust" ..... i think that.......
yes, no atmosphere, but have you seen astronaugts in 0 gravity? They play with food and stuff pushing it and juggling with it around the shuttle.
So what i mean is that ..... yes, no atmosphere, but if you apply energy to an object... it WILL move. No??
So when the lunar module 'rocketed' off..... the 'expelling' force is pushing th dust away. It's forced engery..... nothing to do with no atmosphere.
Do you get what i mean?
Do i make sense??
OK, you guys have killed me on this multiple light source thing :LOL: I surrender
But abt Gray's "dust" ..... i think that.......
yes, no atmosphere, but have you seen astronaugts in 0 gravity? They play with food and stuff pushing it and juggling with it around the shuttle.
So what i mean is that ..... yes, no atmosphere, but if you apply energy to an object... it WILL move. No??
So when the lunar module 'rocketed' off..... the 'expelling' force is pushing th dust away. It's forced engery..... nothing to do with no atmosphere.
Do you get what i mean?
Do i make sense??
The Lander weighed 17 tons yet the astronauts feet seem to have made a bigger dent in the dust. The powerful booster rocket at the base of the Lunar Lander was fired to slow descent to the moons service. Yet it has left no traces of blasting on the dust underneath. It should have created a small crater, yet the booster looks like it's never been fired.
Consider this: the TV footage was hopeless. The world tuned in to watch what looked like two blurred white ghosts throw rocks and dust. Part of the reason for the low quality was that, strangely, NASA provided no direct link up.
By contrast, the still photos were stunning. Yet that's just the problem. The astronauts took thousands of pictures, each one perfectly exposed and sharply focused. Not one was badly composed or even blurred.
That's not all: The cameras had no white meters or view ponders. So the astronauts achieved this feat without being able to see what they were doing. There film stock was unaffected by the intense peaks and powerful cosmic radiation on the Moon, conditions that should have made it useless. They managed to adjust their cameras, change film and swap filters in pressurized suits. It should have been almost impossible with the gloves on their fingers.
The American flag and the words "United States" are always Brightly lit, even when everything around is in shadow. Not one still picture matches the film footage, yet NASA claims both were shot at the same time.
The questions don't stop there. Outer space is awash with deadly radiation that emanates from solar flares firing out from the sun. Standard astronauts orbiting earth in near space, like those who recently fixed the Hubble telescope, are protected by the earth's Van Allen belt. But the Moon is to 240,000 miles distant, way outside this safe band. And, during the Apollo flights, astronomical data shows there were no less than 1,485 such flares.
Theoretically, shielding at least two meters thick would be needed. Yet the walls of the Lunar Landers which took astronauts from the spaceship to the moons surface were, said NASA, about the thickness of heavy duty aluminum foil.
How could that stop this deadly radiation? And if the astronauts were protected by their space suits, why didn't rescue workers use such protective gear at the Chernobyl meltdown, which released only a fraction of the dose astronauts would encounter? Not one Apollo astronaut ever contracted cancer - not even the Apollo 16 crew who were on their way to the Moon when a big flare started. They should have been fried
Point-form oddities:
1. Apollo 14 astronaut Allen Shepard played golf on the Moon. In front of a worldwide TV audience, Mission Control teased him about slicing the ball to the right. Yet a slice is caused by uneven air flow over the ball. The Moon has no atmosphere and no air DAMMIT
2. A camera panned upwards to catch Apollo 16's Lunar Lander lifting off the Moon. Who did the filming?
3. One NASA picture from Apollo 11 is looking up at Neil Armstrong about to take his giant step for mankind. The photographer must have been lying on the planet surface. If Armstrong was the first man on the Moon, then who took the shot?
4. The pressure inside a space suit was greater than inside a football. The astronauts should have been puffed out like the Michelin Man, but were seen freely bending their joints.
5. Text from pictures in the article said that only two men walked on the Moon during the Apollo 12 mission. Yet the astronaut reflected in the visor has no camera. Who took the shot?
6. The flags shadow goes behind the rock so doesn't match the dark line in the foreground, which looks like a line cord. So the shadow to the lower right of the spaceman must be the flag. Where is his shadow?
7. How can the flag be brightly lit when its side is to the light? And where, in all of these shots, are the stars?
Buy on AliExpress.com
