Claudio Marchisio (68 Viewers)

Hust

Senior Member
Hustini
May 29, 2005
93,703
he only showed up because it was the opening match in the new stadium, hence it was important.

why didn't he show up for the next 2 matches?
evidentally he did because conte started him every game.

But go ahead and keep making excuses up.:tup:
 

Cheesio

**********
Jul 11, 2006
22,514
Using haters gonna hate gifs all the time to close an argument, which is quite irritating and childish.
:lol: I argued and none can counter my arguements when i said that Marchisio has been our best MF along Pirlo and he deserves to start but the same guys came here saying Vidal should start and neglected all the ratings that showed that Marchisio performed better whenever on the field, and i attacked when i said before the season started that Vidal should earn his place and guess he can't cause Marchisio is offering more right and when both played on the same time Marchisio did better 95% pass completion that's unheard of and 2 fucking goals that won us the game and yet he still get attacked and people want Vidal to start over him, this why sometimes a gif can things better.
 

Lion

King of Tuz
Jan 24, 2007
36,185
marchisio also had the luxury of starting all the matches while vidal only started 2, and is a new signing in a new league in a new culture.
 

Cheesio

**********
Jul 11, 2006
22,514
marchisio also had the luxury of starting all the matches while vidal only started 2, and is a new signing in a new league in a new culture.
I know, and yet some members wanted Vidal to start over Marchisio even if the latter has been performing better, i fail to see the logic behind that ?
 

Flamez

Senior Member
Feb 7, 2011
1,991
I have/had the same opinion as cheese about Vidal earning his place (actually, I remember that thread), but for me he already did that. Just not relegating Marchisio for the bench, but one of the strikers/wingers.

This Marchisio vs Vidal discussion is completely unnecessary, as both should start.
 
Jul 1, 2010
26,352
I have/had the same opinion as cheese about Vidal earning his place (actually, I remember that thread), but for me he already did that. Just not relegating Marchisio for the bench, but one of the strikers/wingers.

This Marchisio vs Vidal discussion is completely unnecessary, as both should start.
That is quite accurate I think, but I do think that we should use two strikers against the provincial teams as they will be hard to crack with a lone striker. The solution should be rotating Pirlo, Marchisio and Vidal. Actually, resting Pirlo at times may prove to be necessary to keep him fit.
 

Cheesio

**********
Jul 11, 2006
22,514
performing in 2 matches out of 5 so far.
That's what you thinks, he's only supbar performance was against Siena and yet in every game till now he got higher ratings than Vidal, he performed better in the Parma game, The siena both did nothing, in the bologna game he did his role perfectly ( Vidal played as lb) , in the Catania game he was one of our best players and no neted to talk about the Milan game, and i failed to see what Vidal has done so far to relegate Marchisio to the bench, i'll be the first to claim this when the latter stop performing well but it's not fair just because some members wants to see Vidal they diss Marchisio who's been one of our top performers thus far and again.
 

Flamez

Senior Member
Feb 7, 2011
1,991
That is quite accurate I think, but I do think that we should use two strikers against the provincial teams as they will be hard to crack with a lone striker. The solution should be rotating Pirlo, Marchisio and Vidal. Actually, resting Pirlo at times may prove to be necessary to keep him fit.
Marchisio - Pirlo - Vidal
winger - Matri - Vucinic

Two strikers right there. Our wingers are not getting involved in the most part of our game anyway.
Obviously, we'll need to use 4-4-2 at some games, to rest our midfield.
 

Cheesio

**********
Jul 11, 2006
22,514
That is quite accurate I think, but I do think that we should use two strikers against the provincial teams as they will be hard to crack with a lone striker. The solution should be rotating Pirlo, Marchisio and Vidal. Actually, resting Pirlo at times may prove to be necessary to keep him fit.
You still didn't come out of an arguments supporting your campaign to start Vidal over Marchisio ???
 
Jul 1, 2010
26,352
Marchisio - Pirlo - Vidal
winger - Matri - Vucinic

Two strikers right there. Our wingers are not getting involved in the most part of our game anyway.
Obviously, we'll need to use 4-4-2 at some games, to rest our midfield.
That would work yes, I really like the possibility of using Mirko on the left, like he was at Roma.

You still didn't come out of an arguments supporting the campaign to start Vidal over Marchisio ???
I think that Vidal is better than Marchisio but Marchisio played well and doesn't deserve to be benched now. A rotation between our three CMs would be the best option at the moment imo.
 

Hust

Senior Member
Hustini
May 29, 2005
93,703
That's what you thinks, he's only supbar performance was against Siena and yet in every game till now he got higher ratings than Vidal, he performed better in the Parma game, The siena both did nothing, in the bologna game he did his role perfectly ( Vidal played as lb) , in the Catania game he was one of our best players and no neted to talk about the Milan game, and i failed to see what Vidal has done so far to relegate Marchisio to the bench, i'll be the first to claim this when the latter stop performing well but it's not fair just because some members wants to see Vidal they diss Marchisio who's been one of our top performers thus far and again.
:agree:
Well said.
+rep
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 65)