Claudio Marchisio (43 Viewers)

Dostoevsky

Tzu
Administrator
May 27, 2007
89,026
That's exactly it, IN YOUR OPINION...not let others have theirs and not get bashed for it by others.
Opinion is one, and seeing a FACT sometimes and saying it is something totally different.

If 100 people say he had a shit match and you say he was great then it's not only opinion what counts, but biased view.
 

Hust

Senior Member
Hustini
May 29, 2005
93,703
Opinion is one, and seeing a FACT sometimes and saying it is something totally different.

If 100 people say he had a shit match and you say he was great then it's not only opinion what counts, but biased view.
You can't say I am biased if I disagree with 100 saying something different.
 

Hust

Senior Member
Hustini
May 29, 2005
93,703
Of course I can, because it's crystal clear to see he had a poor match. Then you watched something else.

It's how it goes with Del Piero fans too. They always say he was great and refreshing.
No, not at all Dusan. I might analyze a player completely different than you or someone else. I might be looking at something completely different than individual play. That does not make me biased. Not at all.

biased:past participle, past tense of bi·as (Verb)1. Show prejudice for or against (someone or something) unfairly: "the tests were biased against women"; "a biased view of the world".
2. Influence unfairly to invoke favoritism: "her story failed to bias the jury".

I might see something different, but that certainly doesn't make me biased.
 

Dostoevsky

Tzu
Administrator
May 27, 2007
89,026
No, not at all Dusan. I might analyze a player completely different than you or someone else. I might be looking at something completely different than individual play. That does not make me biased. Not at all.

biased:past participle, past tense of bi·as (Verb)1. Show prejudice for or against (someone or something) unfairly: "the tests were biased against women"; "a biased view of the world".
2. Influence unfairly to invoke favoritism: "her story failed to bias the jury".

I might see something different, but that certainly doesn't make me biased.
So Amauri was great after all.
 

Hust

Senior Member
Hustini
May 29, 2005
93,703
All arguments on Marchisio are his "consistency and being invsible in matches" which are completely vague things to try and analyze. With Amauri it was something so simple as scoring goals which he didn't do. There is no confusion or "other opinion" in that.

It is MUCH easier to criticize Amauri than Marchisio considering opposition arguments.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 41)