[CL] Champions League 2015/2016 (33 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.

zizinho

Senior Member
Apr 14, 2013
51,816
Dynamo Kyiv 2 - 2 Porto
Porto 0 - 2 Dynamo Kyiv
Chelsea 2 - 1 Dynamo Kyiv
Dynamo Kyiv 0 - 0 Chelsea
Porto 2 - 1 Chelsea
Chelsea Porto draw

Kyiv 5-4
Chelsea 3-3
Porto 4-5
 

piotrr

Мodеrator
Sep 13, 2011
34,009
What happens if Porto, Chelsea and Kiev finish level on points, who will go through and who will top the group?
That's an interesting question. :D For this to happen, Kiev would have to win, and Chelsea to draw with Porto.

FT FC Porto 0 - 2 Dynamo Kyiv
FT Dynamo Kyiv 2 - 2 FC Porto

FT Chelsea 2 - 1 Dynamo Kyiv
FT Dynamo Kyiv 0 - 0 Chelsea

FT FC Porto 2 - 1 Chelsea
today Chelsea - Porto draw

As we can see Kiev has a better h2h than Porto, but worse h2h than Chelsea.
Chelsea has a better h2h than Kiev, but worse than Porto.
Porto has a better h2h than Chelsea, but worse than Kiev. :lol:

From the rules:
If two or more teams are equal on points on completion of the group matches,
the following criteria are applied in the order given to determine their rankings:

a. higher number of points obtained in the group matches played among the
teams in question;
b. superior goal difference from the group matches played among the teams in
question;

Goal difference:
Kiev 5-4
Chelsea 3-3
Porto 4-5

Since for all this to happen a draw between Chel-Por is necessary, this result wouldn't change the ranking^.
So it seems Kiev would top the group :lol: And Chelsea come second.

Correct me someone if i'm wrong. :boh:

edit:
@zizinho got the same conclusions. :tup:
 

zizinho

Senior Member
Apr 14, 2013
51,816
That's an interesting question. :D For this to happen, Kiev would have to win, and Chelsea to draw with Porto.

FT FC Porto 0 - 2 Dynamo Kyiv
FT Dynamo Kyiv 2 - 2 FC Porto

FT Chelsea 2 - 1 Dynamo Kyiv
FT Dynamo Kyiv 0 - 0 Chelsea

FT FC Porto 2 - 1 Chelsea
today Chelsea - Porto draw

As we can see Kiev has a better h2h than Porto, but worse h2h than Chelsea.
Chelsea has a better h2h than Kiev, but worse than Porto.
Porto has a better h2h than Chelsea, but worse than Kiev. :lol:

From the rules:
If two or more teams are equal on points on completion of the group matches,
the following criteria are applied in the order given to determine their rankings:

a. higher number of points obtained in the group matches played among the
teams in question;
b. superior goal difference from the group matches played among the teams in
question;

Goal difference:
Kiev 5-4
Chelsea 3-3
Porto 4-5

Since for all this to happen a draw between Chel-Por is necessary, this result wouldn't change the ranking^.
So it seems Kiev would top the group :lol: And Chelsea come second.

Correct me someone if i'm wrong. :boh:

edit:
@zizinho got the same conclusions. :tup:
Dynamo Kyiv 2 - 2 Porto
Porto 0 - 2 Dynamo Kyiv
Chelsea 2 - 1 Dynamo Kyiv
Dynamo Kyiv 0 - 0 Chelsea
Porto 2 - 1 Chelsea
Chelsea Porto draw

Kyiv 5-4
Chelsea 3-3
Porto 4-5
Kiev 1st Chelsea 2nd because Kiev has the best goal difference against the other 2
Correct :tup:
 

Seven

In bocca al lupo, Fabio.
Jun 25, 2003
39,346
Where is @Seven when you need him? I hate the attitude I see here.
I feel like I should state two very obvious factors:

1. We tend to do better in two legs. We are a mean, calculated club.
2. If you want to win the CL, you are going to have to beat very big teams at some point anyway. I'm all for facing Barcelona right now.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 32)