[CL] Champions League 2011/12 (39 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Badass J Elkann

It's time to go!!
Feb 12, 2006
69,070
The second penalty is non existing :lol:
not really, nesta's starting position is horrendous, why the fuck is he grabbing onto his shirt? to do that is asking to give away a penalty. milan are defending like amateurs, same with antonini when he fouled messi for the first peno.

anyways regardless of whether the 2nd is a penalty or not, barca were denied a stone wall penalty in the first leg on sanchez so its karma
 

JCK

Biased
JCK
May 11, 2004
125,395
Now I am not watching the match and have no idea what is happening, I just opened Livescore and saw that barca got two penalties. I guess they are cheating their way in this competition like always. Will this ever stop or UEFA really want barca to win it twice in a row and fulfil their dream along with am0ll0 and his likes?

Fucking disgusting club with disgusting fans, followers, defenders, etc.
 

Nzoric

Grazie Mirko
Jan 16, 2011
37,877
Now I am not watching the match and have no idea what is happening, I just opened Livescore and saw that barca got two penalties. I guess they are cheating their way in this competition like always. Will this ever stop or UEFA really want barca to win it twice in a row and fulfil their dream along with am0ll0 and his likes?

Fucking disgusting club with disgusting fans, followers, defenders, etc.
amen

Sendt fra min GT-I9100 med Tapatalk
 

Osman

Koul Khara!
Aug 30, 2002
61,515
The second penalty is non existing :lol:
The timing of when it happens to promixity of the first one is the more lolsy part, but I found first one more questionable (even if Mexes defending was lolsy there). 2nd one, players hold eachothers shirt like that often in games, but Nesta defenitely blatantly overdid it in holding it longer and in obvious way when ref had just previously warned players against that. Was enough to be a foul, what makes it more controversial is a pk was called just before that.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 37)