I am not reffering to Immobile's perpsective with us. I am reffering to the fact that that they both were considered one of the most talented forwards of their generation, that we were concious of their potential, we were owning their contract and we were only waiting for them to become of age, until they will be given a chance to compete in Juve's level.
They way MArotta has handled their contracts with those loans with an option to buy is one and the same.
Being such talents, he ought not accept a loan with an option to buy, or at least get a decent ammount for their value, close to their potential, or decide the ammount of the 50% after his season there, or impose a buy back clause, close to the value the club that benefits from their services has invested for their contract, or at least give us the opportunity to get him back, without owning the full contract and hand them 50% from a future sale, or asking them to pay the other 50% if they want to keep the player.
There are a variety of options to chooce from, as we are the ones having on our hands the player's contract
at any case, we should avoid getting hard owned as we did in Giovinco's case, strictly speaking from the financial/managerial perspective of the player's ownwership.
Owing the contracts of such talents ought to give us a financial advantage, we cannot keep losing money with every deal we are completing...
This post contains the essence of what we did wrong.
And no, we cannot accuse MArotta now, because Giovinco did not deliver his Parma perfromance with us, of course that would be too much for a manager of his class, to realise if the player really is Juve material or not, if he can really adapt on our system or not. Only professional managers could have known that and Marotta is not one of them!
What i was expecting from Marotta though was to use common sense and not gift away Giovinco's half for that ridiculous price, because there was an extremely high probability that we will want to bring the player back.
He was the most talented youngster we owned, for him alone, he should not make a loan with an option to buy deal.
I refuse to believe that striaght loan deals are now absoute and no club in the world wouldnt have been interested to receive the services of such a talented player without paying the full fee.
It is because of MArotta's extremely bad negotiating skills that we give up the player's half contract on such a low price. This is obvious by every player MArotta sells.
As it also obvious that we overpay for almost every player we buy.
In a co own deal, it means that we lose two times because of that, one time when we sell the 50% lower than we should and one time when we overpay in order to get it back.
From all the young players we own, there 4-5 of them (Sorensen, Masi, MAronne and Immobile) htat are so talented in comparison with most of the players of their age, that we know that we are going to get tem back one day.
For these players we should be more carefull.