Ciro Immobile (272 Viewers)

[JuveJay]

It clearly is for some.

He'd improve at just the same rate with half an hour here and there in the Coppa, come on Marceℓℓo...

 

Buy on AliExpress.com

[Marceℓℓo]

But, But...imagine Matri and Co. teaching him things in training...

 

[Dostoevsky]

No co-ownership, close to zero playing time most of the times. That's the price you pay, clubs like Genoa in this case get a reward for using and therefore rising the market value of the co-owned player.

It's not that hard to understand, really.

Then loan him out and don't pay anything later.

 

[alexjuventino]

But, But...imagine Matri and Co. teaching him things in training...

Who would teach him beter in Genoa? PPlease tell me

 

[Salvatore]

Who would teach him beter in Genoa? PPlease tell me

Nobody, he'd learn by playing football.

 

[JuveJay]

Then loan him out and don't pay anything later.

I'm sure this has been explained a million times already but what the hell...If a team pay money for a player to co-own them it is in their interests to use them, improve the player, and either get a better player or increase the value that they can sell the other half for.

 

[Marceℓℓo]

Then loan him out and don't pay anything later.

If it's a simple loan the chances that the loaning team uses the player are less compared to when they co-own the player, for obvious reasons.

Who would teach him beter in Genoa? PPlease tell me

It's not about teaching him, the most important thing at his age is playing time. He gets exactly that at Genoa (and mind you, I really don't think he would be starting today if it was just a simple loan).

 

[Fake Melo]

Who would teach him at Juve? Quagliarella?

 

[Turk_Bianconero]

I'm sure this has been explained a million times already but what the hell...If a team pay money for a player to co-own them it is in their interests to use them, improve the player, and either get a better player or increase the value that they can sell the other half for.

There was no such fuckery back then. Still this shit is not happening outside of Italy. Normally they should pay us for using a quality striker for two seasons.

 

[JuveJay]

Co-ownerships deals seem to be like understanding dark matter for some.

 

[Klin]

Yay indeed. We will have to pay more than 10 million to see him at Juve again.

FFS

[insert any relevant experienced player] could teach [insert any relevant young player] in training is one of the dumbest things I've heard on this forum.

 

[Marceℓℓo]

There was no such $#@!ery back then. Still this $#@! is not happening outside of Italy. Normally they should pay us for using a quality striker for two seasons.

They paid us.

 

[JuveJay]

They paid us.

And this is the part which needs explaining again:- if they don't play him and/or he flops then as the parent club we can buy his half back for less than we sold it for, because his market value will have decreased. We'd have an inferior player, which neither team wants. This is why co-ownerships are mutually beneficial.

You want the player to succeed - parent club gets a better, established player back, and the buying club gets money for their efforts.

 

[Zlatan]

It's like a training/development fee, you get a god player for half his market value. The fact he was yours before is irrelevant, because he wouldnt be as good without the development.

 

[PhRoZeN]

[video=dailymotion;xt2sws]http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xt2sws_genoa-cagliari-2-0-highlights-goals-sky-sport-serie-a_sport[/video]

Thunder strike. Immobile, we might as well get used to it

 

[Mark]

12-15m for other half?


Good to see him score, I hope he continues like this so we know it wasn't Zeman' system the reason he scored so may goals last year.

 

[Nzoric]

12-15m for other half?

If the kid's really got it in him, then 12-15m is nothing for a full year of Serie A experience.

 

[Quetzalcoatl]

How awesome would it be to have a squad comprised of Marchisio, Giovinco, De Ceglie, Marrone and Immobile, and not just as squad players?

 

[Trequartista]

Ma boy

 

[Fake Melo]

Ma boy

OUR (me, u & Salv)'s boy!