Ciro Ferrara, an other year with Juve. (1 Viewer)
- Thread starter mate
- Start date
Considering that we will buy some central defenders 100 % + we will have Ferrara and also it's possible to restore Tudor in this role, I'm not sure we need both Montero and Juliano anymore, and between the 2 I will keep Paolo, if he will accept to have a not garanted place.
Lately rumors are about Stam and Le Grottaglie mouving to Juve... well they are a grate option but we don't have too loose Bonera, Stam it's a bit too old considering how expensive he will be...
Lately rumors are about Stam and Le Grottaglie mouving to Juve... well they are a grate option but we don't have too loose Bonera, Stam it's a bit too old considering how expensive he will be...
Till it won't be official it's better not to have illusions...
Anycase, do you really think that Stam can come 4 free or something near to it? Lazio was near to crack but I don't think they will sell their best players like Stam, Stankovic and Lopez 4 just few money especially cause ther's so many clubs on them and the risck is too see an other "battle" like last year with Nesta...
Anycase, do you really think that Stam can come 4 free or something near to it? Lazio was near to crack but I don't think they will sell their best players like Stam, Stankovic and Lopez 4 just few money especially cause ther's so many clubs on them and the risck is too see an other "battle" like last year with Nesta...
hehe...we'll take your best shot 
(actually I'll let Nina take ur best shot- I'll just collect the rebound )
Seriously tho, IMHO there is a difference betweem being successful and being happy/satisfied.
You can be successful and not be happy. Then you could be happy but not successful. Im not saying one is better than the other, but a good balance between the two is necessary.
(actually I'll let Nina take ur best shot- I'll just collect the rebound )Seriously tho, IMHO there is a difference betweem being successful and being happy/satisfied.
You can be successful and not be happy. Then you could be happy but not successful. Im not saying one is better than the other, but a good balance between the two is necessary.
++ [ originally posted by lacrease ] ++
hehe...we'll take your best shot(actually I'll let Nina take ur best shot- I'll just collect the rebound )
Seriously tho, IMHO there is a difference betweem being successful and being happy/satisfied.
You can be successful and not be happy. Then you could be happy but not successful. Im not saying one is better than the other, but a good balance between the two is necessary.
hehe...we'll take your best shot
(actually I'll let Nina take ur best shot- I'll just collect the rebound )Seriously tho, IMHO there is a difference betweem being successful and being happy/satisfied.
You can be successful and not be happy. Then you could be happy but not successful. Im not saying one is better than the other, but a good balance between the two is necessary.
Theres two schools of thought on that. One that is rooted in the past- that claims that man is essentially primitive and every thought and act a human being does is rooted in his basic cave-man-ish needs and urges.
Then there is this idea that man is essentially a sophisticated creature capable of abstract thought and constructive ability and well-capable of attaining lofty heights and doing great things if they work together rather than try and outcompete together.
I think that the reason the second is not possible is because man has not learned to get past the first stage- the basic, primal needs and wants- realise that he doesnt need to fight to survive any more.
Actually, I've never travelled by train from Barca to Turin, I wouldn't know, I just guessed. I suppose that I guessed wrong.
I don't know where you got the idea that not everything is... And I don't need a heart, at least that's not what any of the people in my life say...
++ [ originally posted by nina ] ++
Shock: everything is not a competition in life. Where do you get this stuff?
Help, Ian needs a heart!!!!
Shock: everything is not a competition in life. Where do you get this stuff?
Help, Ian needs a heart!!!!
naah. they are two totally different ways of thinking. totally. they cant even be put on a spectrum because they are on two different dimensions IMHO.
The whole point is that benefit of one will only come with benefit of all...thats like the root of socialism basically...(not delving into socialism)
Im not against competition. Im just appalled that so many people dont realise that in competition there is one winner and all the rest lose...most of the people here dont realise that they are at the extreme top of the chain and the people who are waaaaay down there completely dwarf us in their size. If they are empowered, and enlightened they would certainly be a force to contend with, in a lot more ways than one, but unfortunately they are not.
Not yet anyways.
The whole point is that benefit of one will only come with benefit of all...thats like the root of socialism basically...(not delving into socialism)
Im not against competition. Im just appalled that so many people dont realise that in competition there is one winner and all the rest lose...most of the people here dont realise that they are at the extreme top of the chain and the people who are waaaaay down there completely dwarf us in their size. If they are empowered, and enlightened they would certainly be a force to contend with, in a lot more ways than one, but unfortunately they are not.
Not yet anyways.
true. it doenst ALWAYS have losers, but it always has one party tht benefit less, and another that benefit more.
I mean even the poor 3rd world countries have money. But the proportion by which it is spread is so unbalanced....
I just wish that everybody was as lucky as everybody else....
(LOL and look at how this argument has gone off-topic)
I mean even the poor 3rd world countries have money. But the proportion by which it is spread is so unbalanced....
I just wish that everybody was as lucky as everybody else....
(LOL and look at how this argument has gone off-topic
)
