And if people would say he was bad at Livorno I wouldn't have said anything, because he wasn't very good. But people are saying he is a bad player, which certainly isn't true.
Why do members here defend Poulsen after every game admitting he did poorly but saying they know he's really a good player and that he just needs a chance. Poulsen gets chances and before every game he plays theres all this hope that he's going to not suck. I don't expect much from Poulsen, I would just like to see him not completely flop and he left our central defense completely exposed against Livorno. If you say he's a good player, what criteria that you are using to judge him? Because it certainly doesn't show in his performances...
Why do members here defend Poulsen after every game admitting he did poorly but saying they know he's really a good player and that he just needs a chance. Poulsen gets chances and before every game he plays theres all this hope that he's going to not suck. I don't expect much from Poulsen, I would just like to see him not completely flop and he left our central defense completely exposed against Livorno. If you say he's a good player, what criteria that you are using to judge him? Because it certainly doesn't show in his performances...
Too many misplaced passes, too many... He wins the ball to give it away... Given a couple of games he may come good... But if we get rid of the injuries he might not get couple of games...
the commitment and tackling was fine, I was hoping for the best when he started out in the ultra aggressive manner...but the fucking chips over the defence into no man's land, time after time, that was fucking annoying like hell