Charlie Hebdo massacre - 2015-Jan-07 (9 Viewers)

Ocelot

Midnight Marauder
Jul 13, 2013
18,943
#42
Yep. You can only meat such horrible events with more peace, democracy and love.

Never a second let them win by slacking on your basic values.
That's what I really admried in the aftermath of the Breivik massacre. The reaction of the government down to the people was outstanding, especially after the fearmongering and ruthless attempts to gain political advantage that's so often happening (I'm looking at you America).
 

Seven

In bocca al lupo, Fabio.
Jun 25, 2003
39,307
#43
Problem? Expand.
I mean that we have slacked on our own core values. Look at the US foreign policy. Despite all the treaties and conventions nothing was ever truly done about it. You can't scream about democracy and human rights with our track record.
 

Hust

Senior Member
Hustini
May 29, 2005
93,702
#44
That's what I really admried in the aftermath of the Breivik massacre. The reaction of the government down to the people was outstanding, especially after the fearmongering and ruthless attempts to gain political advantage that's so often happening (I'm looking at you America).
We are looking back.
 

Xperd

Allegrophobic Infidel
Jun 1, 2012
34,831
#45
How come there werent greater security arrangements? Charlie Hebdo themselves probably knew this was coming.
 

Seven

In bocca al lupo, Fabio.
Jun 25, 2003
39,307
#48
How come there werent greater security arrangements? Charlie Hebdo themselves probably knew this was coming.
Because they make cartoons. And because letting fear take over is rarely the answer. If it was, we'd nuke Syria, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia and a whole lot of other countries. Oh, and everyone on Earth would die in WWIII. That's why there was no extra security.
 

swag

L'autista
Administrator
Sep 23, 2003
84,749
#54
It's a shock to the system to force people to dig deep in their daily lives and recognize what principles they aspire to and believe are important.

You could try to make the case that civil rights in the U.S. during the 1960s could have been better served by threats and violence, but public sympathy would have never come around and I believe things would be even worse in places like Ferguson today if not for that.

Winning the hearts and minds of psychopathic militants is a nice recruiting strategy if you want to kill a handful of cartoonists, but its also a death wish for your own broader public aims. You can try to put the genie back in the bottle like we're still in the Dark Ages, but public sentiment knows that's regressively sheer folly -- and acts like this only alienate them even further to social irrelevancy.
 

Fr3sh

Senior Member
Jul 12, 2011
37,247
#56
Human lives aren't valued by our higher ups, I can't help but feel that. These things could have been cut from the root, so many of these incidents could have easily been avoided. And these ISIS fucks and those random terrorist groups don't appear on their own, cut the funding, cut off the countries that fund them, simple as that.

Every civilian, wishes for peace and prosperity, it's ridicule to believe that the masses want blood, however the masses are tools, and so is religion. We know that states like Qatar, Saudi Arabia and Kuwait, but what does the western world do? Negotiate oil prices with these lunatics, let them host your world cups, get them to pump money into your economy by buying football clubs.

This needs to be cut at the roots.


As for this specific case however, it can very well have been done by a random person, heck somebody ran up in the Canadian Parliment with a rifle and killed a man before getting himself killed, was a recent convert apparently. Regardless, I hope the families of those who got affected directly by this incident get to bury their loved ones and mourn their lost without having a distasteful opinion of all muslims, hate doesn't eliminate hate.
 

Fint

Senior Member
Aug 13, 2010
19,354
#57
European governments do not want Muslims in their countries. Despite it, they couldn't convince some of their citizens about how dangerous Muslims are. What happened today will be their usual attempt to convert them to their 'crusade' against Muslims. It would be naive to think their secret services were caught unaware. Either they did it or they let it happen.
I could tolerate the Marotta hate but this?

WTF man?

Your head must be so far up your ass that your own bullshit is all you have for sustenance
 

swag

L'autista
Administrator
Sep 23, 2003
84,749
#59
You could. It would be called Islamic State.
The IS is a little unique. It's a product of all the f'ed up regional things that have lead up to it.

Typically, psychotic death cults never evolve beyond a certain limited size. They reach a critical mass where the very behaviors that drive them become internalized and these groups implode from within.

If you're basically spitting hate and feeling humiliated all the time and seeking vengeance while carrying military weapons, it doesn't take much to turn that against the very guy who has been training alongside you. Especially when the inevitable human frailties come in: jealousy, hubris, ego, disagreements and an inability to resolve them without killing each other, etc.

So what's surprised me is that IS has managed to be somewhat shelf-stable to this point. The question is whether it can grow further or if it will soon start to crumble from within.
 

Juventino[RUS]

Senior Member
Mar 9, 2006
29,039
#60
Should I say shit about radical Muslims or shouldn't

- - - Updated - - -

And ofc now all the Muslims are act like they are victims :lol: the same people who are doing nothing day after day to prevent situations like this
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 8)