The main objective for FFP was to restrict clubs making big losses every season, paying due obligations, prevent spending above their means that a lot of clubs didnt have proper backing for and that threatened overall stability of the leagues etc... I dont see why would they (Uefa) interfere when owners are making investments into the club, either through sponsorship deals (inflated I agree), debt or share subscription by its owners (our case). How is a club expected to grow? Take 300-400m Agnellis invested over the years and where would we be? I dislike City, but ffp makes no sense to me when you are trying to regulate clubs that have multibillion corporations behind them. If u want to create level playing field, introduce salary caps, transfer fees restrictions, etc...