Calciopoli or Morattopoli.. inter fake orgasm (78 Viewers)
- Thread starter gsol
- Start date
ROMA - Si riapre la partita dello scudetto 2006. Il Tribunale arbitrale dello sport presso il Coni si è dichiarato competente a decidere sul ricorso bianconero contro il no della Figc alla sua richiesta di revoca dello scudetto 2006 all'Inter, e dal suo dispositivo emerge che la Juve ha chiesto la revoca di quel titolo ma anche "la non assegnazione", ovvero che rimanga vacante. Sono questi i due punti sui quali il Tnas deciderà. Il tribunale si è invece detto incompetente sulla richiesta di risarcimento danni.
Alla prima udienza del Tnas si era presentato oggi il presidente della Juve Andrea Agnelli, accompagnato dall'avvocato Briamonte. In discussione, il ricorso di Inter e Federcalcio che chiedeva l'incompetenza dell'organismo a decidere sulla richiesta bianconera. La decisione del Tnas è stata di respingere il ricorso, e dunque di dichiararsi competente a discutere la richiesta di "revocare per vizi di legittimità la decisione del Consiglio federale" che il 18 luglio scorso aveva respinto l'istanza Juve; l'atto del commissario straordinario Guido Rossi del 26 luglio 2006; e di conseguenza il titolo assegnato all'Inter. Il Tnas discuterà anche sulla richiesta della Juve "che si dichiari 'non assegnatò il titolo di Campione d'Italia per gli anni 2005-2006".
Il Tnas si ritiene invece incompetente a decidere sulla "quantificazione, secondo un equo apprezzamento, del diritto soggettivo della Juventus Football Club s. p. a. al risarcimento dei danni patiti
e patiendi, patrimoniali e non patrimoniali, causati dai provvedimenti indicati"
Alla prima udienza del Tnas si era presentato oggi il presidente della Juve Andrea Agnelli, accompagnato dall'avvocato Briamonte. In discussione, il ricorso di Inter e Federcalcio che chiedeva l'incompetenza dell'organismo a decidere sulla richiesta bianconera. La decisione del Tnas è stata di respingere il ricorso, e dunque di dichiararsi competente a discutere la richiesta di "revocare per vizi di legittimità la decisione del Consiglio federale" che il 18 luglio scorso aveva respinto l'istanza Juve; l'atto del commissario straordinario Guido Rossi del 26 luglio 2006; e di conseguenza il titolo assegnato all'Inter. Il Tnas discuterà anche sulla richiesta della Juve "che si dichiari 'non assegnatò il titolo di Campione d'Italia per gli anni 2005-2006".
Il Tnas si ritiene invece incompetente a decidere sulla "quantificazione, secondo un equo apprezzamento, del diritto soggettivo della Juventus Football Club s. p. a. al risarcimento dei danni patiti
e patiendi, patrimoniali e non patrimoniali, causati dai provvedimenti indicati"
This post explains 66 bad calls that Inter received in their favor since calciopoli. It is in Italian thought.
http://www.vecchiasignora.com/topic/178248-dossier-sul-calciopulitodi-moratti-58-errori-arbitrali-eclatanti-pro-inter/
http://www.vecchiasignora.com/topic/178248-dossier-sul-calciopulitodi-moratti-58-errori-arbitrali-eclatanti-pro-inter/
Interesting
Interesting
There are far worse videos for Man united and Barcelona. It's not that the refs are paid, it's just that refs give the bigger teams the benefit of the doubt most of the time and go with their gut.
If you see Messi fall on his face, you'd assume that he was fouled instantly, but that isn't the case sometimes. We were the champions of Italy and one of the most feared teams in the world of football, a few ref mistakes comes with the territory.
I love reading forums of the Milan teams whose members are still convinced we were especially favoured by the refs (LOL), during our glory years. It's as if they think their clubs were never helped and they always won fair and square without ever themselves winning points off terrible refereeing decisions. Absolutely laughable and pathetic, but expected by the fans of those two clubs.
Fact is, most big clubs in every league in the world tend to get better treatment off the refs. It's nothing new and to point the finger at Juve exclusively, as if we were bribing refs (utter bullshit, which has been disproven time and time again) and all the other big teams were playing by the rules and being shunted by "the system" is fucking hilarious, pathetic and borderline delusional. But as I said earlier, you come to expect it off fans of those clubs.
Fact is, most big clubs in every league in the world tend to get better treatment off the refs. It's nothing new and to point the finger at Juve exclusively, as if we were bribing refs (utter bullshit, which has been disproven time and time again) and all the other big teams were playing by the rules and being shunted by "the system" is fucking hilarious, pathetic and borderline delusional. But as I said earlier, you come to expect it off fans of those clubs.
Oh and another thing I was reading on the "red and black" forums the other day, proof of our collusion of refs was our so called "terrible" record in Europe during our glory days. If you call making 3 CL finals in a row, + a semi final and another final appearance a few years later, "terrible" I dont know what else to say. Sure, we didnt win many of those finals but to make it there in the first place without our so called "ref help" pretty much disproves that bullshit theory.
Juve want Inter thrown out of Europe!
Juventus have asked UEFA to kick Inter out of the Champions League, as the legal battle over the 2006 Scudetto drags on.
The Bianconeri lost their initial bid to have the title revoked when the FIGC ruled it was not competent to take such action, as the statute of limitations had expired.
However, on Friday the appeal to the Italian Olympic Committee’s tribunal (Tnas) got a positive response.
Tnas President Alberto de Roberto confirmed they are in a position to judge on the Scudetto that was stripped from Juventus in the Calciopoli scandal of 2006, but put back into doubt by new evidence against Inter.
This ruling means the statute of limitations no longer applies, so evidence against Inter could be used to remove the 2006 title.
Juve’s lawyers have also reportedly taken action on a more global scale by asking UEFA to throw Inter out of the Champions League.
According to Tuttosport, the Nerazzurri are now under investigation for the Calciopoli scandal and could therefore be subject to the same punishment as Fenerbahce.
The Turkish side were pulled out of the Champions League this season by their FA to 'protect the sport’ during investigations into a betting scandal.
However, it is extremely unlikely that this will be anything other than a scare tactic from Juventus lawyers.
Juventus have asked UEFA to kick Inter out of the Champions League, as the legal battle over the 2006 Scudetto drags on.
The Bianconeri lost their initial bid to have the title revoked when the FIGC ruled it was not competent to take such action, as the statute of limitations had expired.
However, on Friday the appeal to the Italian Olympic Committee’s tribunal (Tnas) got a positive response.
Tnas President Alberto de Roberto confirmed they are in a position to judge on the Scudetto that was stripped from Juventus in the Calciopoli scandal of 2006, but put back into doubt by new evidence against Inter.
This ruling means the statute of limitations no longer applies, so evidence against Inter could be used to remove the 2006 title.
Juve’s lawyers have also reportedly taken action on a more global scale by asking UEFA to throw Inter out of the Champions League.
According to Tuttosport, the Nerazzurri are now under investigation for the Calciopoli scandal and could therefore be subject to the same punishment as Fenerbahce.
The Turkish side were pulled out of the Champions League this season by their FA to 'protect the sport’ during investigations into a betting scandal.
However, it is extremely unlikely that this will be anything other than a scare tactic from Juventus lawyers.
