Calciopoli or Morattopoli.. inter fake orgasm (50 Viewers)

Quetzalcoatl

It ain't hard to tell
Aug 22, 2007
66,964
"Juventus Football Club would like to point out that, even if a period of time has elapsed, the club is still focused on the events related to the petition submitted one year ago (10th May 2010) to the Italian Football Federation (FIGC). The sense of respect towards the freedom of Sports Justice Bodies is counterbalanced by the sense of responsibility towards millions of fans who are still waiting for a response. Treatment equity should always be assumed as the prerogative of Justice in every judgment place, instance and level."
 

Mark

The Informer
Administrator
Dec 19, 2003
97,865
Borrelli admits Calciopoli was a farce.

- I couldn't ask for the phone calls/transcripts.
- They sent some to me after they showed up in the papers.
- I got only the ones to penalize Juve.
- If I had the ones from other clubs then it would have been a whole new story.
- I was deprived of all the facts.
- It was embarrassing using only certain calls/transcripts and not allowing the defense to defend itself to the Sporting Court.


:sergio:
 

alvin_89er

Senior Member
Apr 11, 2011
858
Borrelli admits Calciopoli was a farce.

- I couldn't ask for the phone calls/transcripts.
- They sent some to me after they showed up in the papers.
- I got only the ones to penalize Juve.
- If I had the ones from other clubs then it would have been a whole new story.
- I was deprived of all the facts.
- It was embarrassing using only certain calls/transcripts and not allowing the defense to defend itself to the Sporting Court.


:sergio:
I think anyone who has any knowledge of this subject, knows calciopoli = Farsopoli was a cover-up for our enemies to severely weaken the club, i would'nt surprised if elkann was in on it. Club got sold-out, by it's owners, period:sergio: Only good thing that came out of it is that we get compensation for the loss of revenue around 200-250million, then we could assemble a awesome squad:tup:
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 1, Guests: 47)