Calciopoli or Morattopoli.. inter fake orgasm (62 Viewers)
- Thread starter gsol
- Start date
Looks like we use the Public opinion term in different ways. I think I meant something completely different from what you meant or said. I don't disagree now that I got your point.
Isn't clear for everyone why we were the only ones? Of course except those who see Moggi as the devil and are merely convinced that we deserved our punishment are on a different path.
Isn't clear for everyone why we were the only ones? Of course except those who see Moggi as the devil and are merely convinced that we deserved our punishment are on a different path.
:analcanon:
Breaking News: Massimo Moratti on his way to become a lifetime bianconero.
Moved by the actions of some L. Moggi, Mr. Moratti has been requested to wear a bianconero jersey. Details emerged that logos, badges and sport styling are not requisitory, further although the contract is without a release clause, payments are minimal. The ceremony will commence at the 'Opera' (via Camporgnago 40, 20141, milano) tomorrow.
:jvefan:
Breaking News: Massimo Moratti on his way to become a lifetime bianconero.
Moved by the actions of some L. Moggi, Mr. Moratti has been requested to wear a bianconero jersey. Details emerged that logos, badges and sport styling are not requisitory, further although the contract is without a release clause, payments are minimal. The ceremony will commence at the 'Opera' (via Camporgnago 40, 20141, milano) tomorrow.
:jvefan:
make sure you dont miss the chance
http://www.tuttosport.com/calcio/se...ciopoli,+spunta+un’altra+griglia+di+Facchetti
translation please, its call between pairetto and facchetti
translation please, its call between pairetto and facchetti
There was also an accurate summary of the call, but the investigators did not included in the information. Why? In Naples, the expert engineer ever deeper into chaos
ROME, Oct. 14 - It 's the realm of the possible and the impossible, Calciopoli: an examination of telephone calls that the experts are of Pairetto - with great difficulty - playing on the same CD that ineffable consultant engineer of the Court of Naples Roberto Porto ago hard to decipher, it appears an anthology of calls defined by the investigators irrelevant and therefore not included in the information that formed the unique pattern of process sports (as well as the cornerstone of the prosecution in criminal proceedings in progress). Yet there are calls that were not lost to the Carabinieri. For example, the rough draft drawn up by Marshal Nardone would be interesting to test material in 2006 for the investigators sports (those that neglecting the revelations of Bergamo on the phone with Facchetti, Sacchi, Capello and other executives). Marshall writes: "Giacinto Facchetti March 31, 2005 at 14:01 Gigi calls and asks if it is true that the arbitrators of the challenges of the Champions League with AC Milan have SARS and MERK. Then sunteggia Nardone, "Hyacinth tries to figure out who will referee next Saturday's Inter and Gigi explains that they will do anything to put Hill in the grid." A fixation, that of the Bald. Another transparent grid. Not just from Bergamo, but also Pairetto and not only for international designations.
Transcribed - Here is the call of 31 March 2005 of 14.01.
Pairetto: Hello?
Facchetti: Hello Gigi, how are you?
Pairetto: Well, thank you.
Facchetti: they told me is that Volker Roth, as an observer, but in the second.
Pairetto: At first there will be Lernikov.
Facchetti: And Referees?
Pairetto: There's the first SARS outbreak, the French, is doing well lately. E 'on the rise. Merk is the second, the decisive one, for that you have the best.
Facchetti: Ah
Pairetto: The best, the best in Europe for the second, which is more Facchetti: The latter may have implications
more?
Pairetto: the first is more tactical, the second is decisive. Roth is
Facchetti: Then we see on Saturday. They give us all (inaudible)
Pairetto: We put all international, put in Milan, Inter. And we have put in place in all the Hill on Saturday (Juve and Milan will anticipate all because of the Champions, ed), he arbitrates Tuesday (in the Champions League, Ed) can not run on Sundays. Otherwise it ends up that happens in a race on Sunday. We'll gri-glia all races on Saturday. The three on Saturday and see if we add one of B. There Torino-Empoli, Perugia-Terni, there are a couple of tough races.
Facchetti: I figured, okay, okay with the switch. Talk to you soon.
PORT TOGETHER - finally revealed the mystery of the transcript of the call 4853: from Bergamo that grid sketched on the phone with Facchetti at 9:51 of the day - only at 11 - would have proceeded to draw the arbitrators. In any case, here is the truth of the transcription will be the focus of heavy protests by the lawyers at the hearing on 19. The expert has run Port reneged expertise: the court hearing on October 1 Casoria had argued with Porto over the counter of the texts that the transcripts were officially filed. But no: October 7 Porto writes the following. "I myself do the following: September 15, 2010 I filed the second report audio transcripts, Oct. 4 (indeed, Oct. 1: look at the dates, Porto, ed), I confirmed in the hearing, the report drawn up by me, in two days Subsequent to this confirmation, various newspapers reported sports were some of the steps of the call 4853 26 November 2004, reviewing the written record I realized (ooops, ed) that it has filed a draft of it (the only differences between the 186 transcribed and filed between now and the thousands of 2006? ed), with some inaccuracies. For the above reasons, I signed today in filing the transcript of the conversation, 4853, reiterating that, for a mere clerical error, the report I filed on September 15 (September 23 and finished in Figc ed) has been reported in a draft the same shall be read replaced by the attached. " One phone call following the Bergamo-Facchetti changed with the passage fought only "okay, put some inside?" And "Hill" attributes it to Facchetti. One mistake made imbufalire Moggi's lawyers: "Never seen anything like that." Ask that their consultant alongside the expert of the court to prevent further drafts produced by mistake.
IMPORTANT? - And then, determining who is truly say the name of Hill? The lawyer Maurilio Prioreschi, defending Moggi, says no: "Who says 'Put the Hill' is of no relevance. Quell'intercettazione should be read in conjunction with the above-Facchetti Mazzei (11.25.2004 ed), where Mazzei announced assistants, 'number 1 and number 2' (Ivaldi and Pisacreta), where Facchetti clearly says' We have a number referees: put Hill ', Mazzei says,' But how do we do? There is the draw, 'and Facchetti said:' But no, which draw! Talk to Bergamo ', Bergamo and then later called Facchetti is the continuation of the natural call. Now that you say or tell Bergamo Facchetti frankly does not matter: the meaning of the call is clear. Only those who are in bad faith fails to understand and then try to at straws as to who said it. "
Its google translate
ROME, Oct. 14 - It 's the realm of the possible and the impossible, Calciopoli: an examination of telephone calls that the experts are of Pairetto - with great difficulty - playing on the same CD that ineffable consultant engineer of the Court of Naples Roberto Porto ago hard to decipher, it appears an anthology of calls defined by the investigators irrelevant and therefore not included in the information that formed the unique pattern of process sports (as well as the cornerstone of the prosecution in criminal proceedings in progress). Yet there are calls that were not lost to the Carabinieri. For example, the rough draft drawn up by Marshal Nardone would be interesting to test material in 2006 for the investigators sports (those that neglecting the revelations of Bergamo on the phone with Facchetti, Sacchi, Capello and other executives). Marshall writes: "Giacinto Facchetti March 31, 2005 at 14:01 Gigi calls and asks if it is true that the arbitrators of the challenges of the Champions League with AC Milan have SARS and MERK. Then sunteggia Nardone, "Hyacinth tries to figure out who will referee next Saturday's Inter and Gigi explains that they will do anything to put Hill in the grid." A fixation, that of the Bald. Another transparent grid. Not just from Bergamo, but also Pairetto and not only for international designations.
Transcribed - Here is the call of 31 March 2005 of 14.01.
Pairetto: Hello?
Facchetti: Hello Gigi, how are you?
Pairetto: Well, thank you.
Facchetti: they told me is that Volker Roth, as an observer, but in the second.
Pairetto: At first there will be Lernikov.
Facchetti: And Referees?
Pairetto: There's the first SARS outbreak, the French, is doing well lately. E 'on the rise. Merk is the second, the decisive one, for that you have the best.
Facchetti: Ah
Pairetto: The best, the best in Europe for the second, which is more Facchetti: The latter may have implications
more?
Pairetto: the first is more tactical, the second is decisive. Roth is
Facchetti: Then we see on Saturday. They give us all (inaudible)
Pairetto: We put all international, put in Milan, Inter. And we have put in place in all the Hill on Saturday (Juve and Milan will anticipate all because of the Champions, ed), he arbitrates Tuesday (in the Champions League, Ed) can not run on Sundays. Otherwise it ends up that happens in a race on Sunday. We'll gri-glia all races on Saturday. The three on Saturday and see if we add one of B. There Torino-Empoli, Perugia-Terni, there are a couple of tough races.
Facchetti: I figured, okay, okay with the switch. Talk to you soon.
PORT TOGETHER - finally revealed the mystery of the transcript of the call 4853: from Bergamo that grid sketched on the phone with Facchetti at 9:51 of the day - only at 11 - would have proceeded to draw the arbitrators. In any case, here is the truth of the transcription will be the focus of heavy protests by the lawyers at the hearing on 19. The expert has run Port reneged expertise: the court hearing on October 1 Casoria had argued with Porto over the counter of the texts that the transcripts were officially filed. But no: October 7 Porto writes the following. "I myself do the following: September 15, 2010 I filed the second report audio transcripts, Oct. 4 (indeed, Oct. 1: look at the dates, Porto, ed), I confirmed in the hearing, the report drawn up by me, in two days Subsequent to this confirmation, various newspapers reported sports were some of the steps of the call 4853 26 November 2004, reviewing the written record I realized (ooops, ed) that it has filed a draft of it (the only differences between the 186 transcribed and filed between now and the thousands of 2006? ed), with some inaccuracies. For the above reasons, I signed today in filing the transcript of the conversation, 4853, reiterating that, for a mere clerical error, the report I filed on September 15 (September 23 and finished in Figc ed) has been reported in a draft the same shall be read replaced by the attached. " One phone call following the Bergamo-Facchetti changed with the passage fought only "okay, put some inside?" And "Hill" attributes it to Facchetti. One mistake made imbufalire Moggi's lawyers: "Never seen anything like that." Ask that their consultant alongside the expert of the court to prevent further drafts produced by mistake.
IMPORTANT? - And then, determining who is truly say the name of Hill? The lawyer Maurilio Prioreschi, defending Moggi, says no: "Who says 'Put the Hill' is of no relevance. Quell'intercettazione should be read in conjunction with the above-Facchetti Mazzei (11.25.2004 ed), where Mazzei announced assistants, 'number 1 and number 2' (Ivaldi and Pisacreta), where Facchetti clearly says' We have a number referees: put Hill ', Mazzei says,' But how do we do? There is the draw, 'and Facchetti said:' But no, which draw! Talk to Bergamo ', Bergamo and then later called Facchetti is the continuation of the natural call. Now that you say or tell Bergamo Facchetti frankly does not matter: the meaning of the call is clear. Only those who are in bad faith fails to understand and then try to at straws as to who said it. "
Its google translate
