Once again Denco you posted nothing though. Just personal attacks and claims you think aren't up for debate.
You are beginning to annoy me now, do you know what a personal attack is?
A personal attack is calling you names and I have not done it, but you keep insisting on bringing up that as a base for not acknowledging that i make sense.
Conspiracy theories is not a personal attack as a lot of people do so not just you.
When I personally attack you, you will be in no doubt that I am personally attacking you so stop with the crybaby shit.
I read last week Galliani using the same stats company you quoted and he said they proved that Milan are the most victimed club in the land
Now that to me is horseshit but people always use stats to their advantage as stats can be misinterpreted.
The problem with you is that you always put yourself in a hole , lucky luke says you are full of bla bla bla and you say that when someone has conceded defeat thats when they do that.
But Gsol you have done the same to me by saying I have not siad anything, does this man you too have conceded defeat?
I wanna bring an analogy into this argument and pardon the controversial status of this
Sadaam Hussein was said to be a tyrant, despot whatever, by the West. No matter how we look at it, the motives were financial(oil) and political similar to your arguments about Moggi and Juventus.
Tony Blair and Bush said Iraq had weapons of mass destruction and thats why they sent troops to invade Iraq and overthrow Saddam, we later found out that Iraq had no such weapons just like you said Juventus amd Moggi were found to be clean.
Sadaam was tried and executed, juve were demoted. Are we now saying because that because no weapons were found that Sadaam was totally innocent of any atrocities he was accused of? Can you prove that he was bad?
But I bet you would find far more than 2800 of Sadaam supporters telling you that he is innocent.
The poin is that the fact that no weapons were found does not mean he is innocent, the fact that America and Britain would benefit oil wise if he is removed does not mean he is innocent.
The fact that there are other countries with weapons of mass destruction but do not benefit the politics involved does not mean Saddam is innocent.
Now a Saddam supporter can quite easily bring out various documents and all sorts of things to prove that the Allied powers were very wrong to do what they did because there was nothing to prove that he had weapons of mass destruction.
This is exactly what you are doing bringing up facts and documents that talk about a miniscule of Juventus's crime but does not delve into everything.
Like the majority of Iraqi people, Juventus supporters in the main know we are a guilty club , it is just the manner that the powers that be went about punishing that leaves a sour taste in the mouths of both so lets stop with we are innocent garbage because we are not.
For the record i have no idea if Saddam is guilty of anything from a personal level but I do have some Iraqi friends and they were not sad to see his demise and just like juventus, you could not have removed him from power just for political and financial gain if he was a good man as the world would have gone apeshit.
There are a few rumblings but that is to be expected
Buy on AliExpress.com
int: 
