++ [ originally posted by denco ] ++
I am not in agreement with anyone who says our attack was poor yesterday becos of Trez'z absence as they created lots of chances and were either unlucky or stopped by very good defending by Bologna
Dp had 2 very good chances the first was saved by Vanoli and the second he should have done better with which hit the post, Zambrotta had a chance when he should have headed in but for some reason he missed it
Trez good finisher he is but of all the forwards has the worst movement of all our forwards and I am including Zalayeta and it was movement that got those guys in those areas
We could do with Di vaio nad Dp being a lot sharper thougt
I am not in agreement with anyone who says our attack was poor yesterday becos of Trez'z absence as they created lots of chances and were either unlucky or stopped by very good defending by Bologna
Dp had 2 very good chances the first was saved by Vanoli and the second he should have done better with which hit the post, Zambrotta had a chance when he should have headed in but for some reason he missed it
Trez good finisher he is but of all the forwards has the worst movement of all our forwards and I am including Zalayeta and it was movement that got those guys in those areas
We could do with Di vaio nad Dp being a lot sharper thougt
What the meaning of creating so many chances if they are wasted?
Also when he is not in schape he's necessary, and infact there was 2 Juventus this year... one at the begininnig, without Treze, who was the tird in serie A and an other one, with him, who gained the top and managed to win even when the team was not playing so well...
Last year he bringed Juve to the scudetto, this year he was never at his 100% but results are speaking 4 him... just try to see the average of point a match we did with him and without him...
++ [ originally posted by denco ] ++
Again the ratings are crap imo why should Montero get 5 and the quite diabolical Iuliano get more than he, Nevded the media darling of cos gets his customary 7 even if for the last 20 mins he was hardle anywhere to be seen and how can anyone award Conte 6, the same mark as Davids
The only accurate one is prob Dp's 5.5 even if 5 might be more accurate
Again the ratings are crap imo why should Montero get 5 and the quite diabolical Iuliano get more than he, Nevded the media darling of cos gets his customary 7 even if for the last 20 mins he was hardle anywhere to be seen and how can anyone award Conte 6, the same mark as Davids
The only accurate one is prob Dp's 5.5 even if 5 might be more accurate
Ratings are not always so "perfect" and infact they always differ a bit from a newspaper from the other... Anycase 4 who give them this is their job so they schould have some knowlenge...
The only one I really do not understand is Repubblica's 5.5 to Zambrotta, he was the best in field IMO (and infact he was given from 6.5 to 7.5 from all the others) not only he created the first goal and made the assist 4 the second, but he was largely the one "more alive" of Juventus...
