Board & Management (105 Viewers)

Badass J Elkann

It's time to go!!
Feb 12, 2006
68,899
It’s all guessing but personally I think that they’re overthrown by the movement. Hearing the minister of sport and the head of the Serie A with a critical note aswel of course these recent days.

If it are only 50 to 100k people unsubscribing (which seems feasible at this moment) it would already cause a 20 to 40m loss annually for DAZN. And only 6 days have passed since the verdict

Behind the scenes probably many things are going on and it’s impossible that the head of operations of DAZN/Sky in Italy aren’t complaining to the FIGC now. Obviously they’re afraid.

The salary case would’ve started quite soon and if it would’ve resulted negative for us the pressure would only increase. Probably the most logical thing to do for the FIGC is buying some time and trying to understand what the hell they should do. We on the other side are probably ‘lucky’ with the timing as they should start negotiating the next tv deal in the coming months.

As said it’s guessing but this is my guess.
If the figc needs answers as to what to do they should ask me. I find it baffling how they are afforded 10 days to draw up their reasons for their verdict after they've sentenced it. Might as well sentence someone to death row without a reason till after they've died
 

Buy on AliExpress.com

lgorTudor

Senior Member
Jan 15, 2015
32,951
When should we expect solid news?
2035

Bendventus has rolled over and literally nothing is gonna happen, unless Elkann sells to sheikhs, in that case news tomorrow about FIGC officials reconsidering their verdict, then withdrawing to their private yachts which somehow fell from a truck
 

Hist

Founder of Hism
Jan 18, 2009
11,603
Juve's average capital gains/turnover ratio between 2016 & 2020 : 25,5%.
Serie A's average capital gains/turnover ratio between 16 & 20 : 23,09%.
Everything is before our eyes.

- - - Updated - - -

In 10 years, "player trading" at Juventus is approximately 700 million, 17% of turnover (4.5 billion). In individual years it has never gone beyond 30%, far from the threshold of 40%. Other clubs have made capital gains of over 40-50, in one case even 90% [@mirkonicolino)
If this is true then that’s a great counter argument to the claim that we uniquely exhibit a pattern.

if their argument for why we are the only ones punished is that our behaviour is fraudulent and exhibits a pattern that’s anomalous in scale and frequency when in fact it’s totally normal at our scale then definitely other clubs must get sucked into this.

I could see them saying Napoli has one or two suspicious cases while we have 50 so we get it worse, but if Napoli and many others also have tons of deals like this then that argument fails.
 
Aug 2, 2005
4,418
Juve: season stopped.. no clue if it will resume, we have debit and no revenues, hey players, you have to abandon 4 months of salary, and if the season resumes, we will pay back in good faith.
Player: no, no way we will accept this. We also have expenses and these salaries are important to us.
Players in between each other: come on guys, the club has a point, how would you feel if you were them.. you are sitting at home and not playing and they are bearing the loss, let's agree on the condition of resuming the season, we must get paid proportionally. Everyone agrees and asks for a written agreement.
Club: written? How the fuck are we going to do that.. it is still going to be very bad on the balance sheet.
Board member: we can make that agreement in the shape of a special bonus upon next year/s balance. This season's balance sheet can show 90 million less.
That seems legal, let's do it, and in the press release, let's just say that we may/may not pay the full amount.. depending on what will happen in the future.




Well.. two things I don't understand.
- why the club supposedly hid those agreements? Covid years FFP etc were off the hock, business were losing left and right.
Plus.. the club is still paying after all.
Impact on stock, maybe.
Impact on the Sarri title = Zero.. no one can touch a point from that season. Any financial gain had nothing to do with the title.

Then, the other thing I don't understand.. why would FIGC consider banning the players? It makes no sense. What wrong did they do? If anything it is the club who "may made" a mistake.


And of course.. then.. how that would give adv. On the field?
Ability to keep the players and buy new ones? Maybe,, then how would you calculate the benefit/adv.



The club could be punished. There could be a ground for it, though, the players should NOT.
Which again makes this whole system in Italy a total rot.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 94)