Blu Ray Disc: The Next Generation (1 Viewer)

Oct 3, 2004
1,121
#1
This is Betamax vs. VHS format revisted. The laserdisc was a failure due to it's ridiculously huge size.

DVD format came and revolutionised the way we watch movies with it's superior quality and easy-to-use interactive features.

The 1998 success was soon to be short-lived, compared to the 15-18 year popularity of VHS. Enter Blu Ray technology. Basically the "blu ray" player emits a blue ray, as opposed to the DVD/HD-DVD that emits red laser beam.

Thanks to Sony, this technology is going re-revolutionise the media-format technology once again - superior quality, and fits a sh*tload of memory.

The Playstation 3 is the first video game console to use this technology, as opposed to Microsoft's X-Box that uses HD-DVD.

Speaking of which, both Microsoft and Toshiba are the losers (and DVD forum as a whole) since they've refused to join the blu-ray forum.

On the other hand, in addition to Sony (obviously, they 'invented' it) - Panasonic :touched: , LG (yuck), Pioneer (booo!!), Samsuck (korean wanna-be's) and several other top brands have decided to adopt the format. Blu ray machines are backward compatible meaning you can play DVD/HD DVD on them. So you don't have to throw away your old DVDs :D

In addition to this - Hollywood, Paramount, 20th Century Fox, MGM and several other movie companies which we see just before the opening credits of a film :p have agreed to adopt Blu Ray as their regular format. :)

A Blu Ray player from Panasonic would cost you around $1,300 the BD-10. Now you can go cheap and buy one for $800...but it would have a sh*tty Samsuck logo on it...and I highly recommend you stay away from anything that says Samsuck on it. :rolleyes:

Oh, and finally have no fear DVD-Recording fans, there are also Blu Ray recorders coming out as well. That would be the final nail in the coffin of DVD ;)

For more info on blu ray technology visit -

http://www.blu-ray.com/
 

Buy on AliExpress.com

V

Senior Member
Jun 8, 2005
20,110
#3
  • V

    V

all i hope for is that they are more resistant than dvd's. god damn it you put that thing on a desk for 2 minutes no reader in the world will copy it for you.
 

Martin

Senior Member
Dec 31, 2000
56,913
#9
Possibly. I just read an opinion about that today which I think has some relevance.

"Computerworld has picked apart the way Vista handles DRM in terms of hardware and software restrictions. Trusted Platform Module, Output Protection Management, Protected Video Path and various Windows Media software components are designed to "protect" copyrighted content against security breaches and unauthorized use. The article notes that many of the DRM technologies were forced upon Vista by the entertainment industry, but that may not garner Microsoft or Hollywood any sympathy with consumers: 'Matt Rosoff, lead analyst at research firm Directions On Microsoft, asserts that this process does not bode well for new content formats such as Blu-ray and HD-DVD, neither of which are likely to survive their association with DRM technology. "I could not be more skeptical about the viability of the DRM included with Vista, from either a technical or a business standpoint," Rosoff stated. "It's so consumer-unfriendly that I think it's bound to fail — and when it fails, it will sink whatever new formats content owners are trying to impose."'"
http://it.slashdot.org/it/06/11/16/0112214.shtml


Ie. these new technologies will be crippled out of the box in some ways (I don't know the details, I'm sure google does), so you'll be restricted in what you can and can't do. And obviously this goes against flexibility and convenience, so it will piss you off.

There are lots of ways in which a technology can completely misfire, this could be one of those cases. Note how we don't urgently need this stuff anyway, DVD's are roomy enough, we don't handle 10's of gigabytes yet, files aren't growing that much. Besides, you can watch decent quality movies in DVD's already. The movie industry wants this to happen, cause they have exerted the influence of this technology to be restricted to protect their interests.
 

Rami

The Linuxologist
Dec 24, 2004
8,065
#10
OMG, those recorders are HUGE!! No thanks I think I will wait for a year or two. Not an early adopter when it comes to paying $1500 +

Edit: And what Martin said :D
 

Boudz

Mercato Tourist
Aug 1, 2002
2,608
#13
the HD-DVD has a 0.6 mm protection layer while the Blu-Ray has a 0.1 mm protection layer. But the Blu-Ray has hard coating and the HD-Dvd doesn. Which one is more durable?
 

gray

Senior Member
Moderator
Apr 22, 2003
30,260
#14
Rhizoid said:
Samsuck (korean wanna-be's)
:mad:


Martin said:
we don't handle 10's of gigabytes yet
I download in 10's of gigabytes, so I could certainly do with some handier storage media than DVD-R's, and I'm not made of money so buying multiple portable HDD's isn't a solution :tdown:
 

Martin

Senior Member
Dec 31, 2000
56,913
#15
gray said:
I download in 10's of gigabytes, so I could certainly do with some handier storage media than DVD-R's, and I'm not made of money so buying multiple portable HDD's isn't a solution :tdown:
When I say 'we' I mean the average person, not torrent junkies. :D
 
OP
Rhizoid
Oct 3, 2004
1,121
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #16
    Stripper said:
    the HD-DVD has a 0.6 mm protection layer while the Blu-Ray has a 0.1 mm protection layer. But the Blu-Ray has hard coating and the HD-Dvd doesn. Which one is more durable?
    Good question. The Blu-Ray disc is more durable and can "survive" a more rigorous scratch, than the conventional DVDs.

    Martin said:
    You really are a PR man
    Our brand is top of the line. :stuckup: :touched:

    gray - sorry mate...of all our competitors, I hate Samsuck.

    And they're higher than us in the top brands of 2006 list :disagree: :(
     

    Rami

    The Linuxologist
    Dec 24, 2004
    8,065
    #18
    Rhizoid said:
    And they're higher than us in the top brands of 2006 list :disagree: :(
    Well "top brand" does not equal technical superiority ;)

    Samsung brand is much stronger, I bet it also scores higher in the "top of mind" field over Panasonic...
     

    Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)