Bloody Sunday (1 Viewer)

Red

-------
Moderator
Nov 26, 2006
47,024
#21
I also don't really see the point in apologising for one incident surrounded by any number of despicable acts by both sides, which all seem to have been forgotten about amongst all this.
 

Buy on AliExpress.com

IrishZebra

Western Imperialist
Jun 18, 2006
23,327
#22
I also don't really see the point in apologising for one incident surrounded by any number of despicable acts by both sides, which all seem to have been forgotten about amongst all this.
To be fair my original post was about them apologising for all the atrocties that they commited in Ireland, from Cromwell to the Black n Tans.

Don't get me wrong the IRA these days are dickheads but back when NI was first founded there was an Apartheid against Catholics by the state and something needed to be done. The problem began when they started attacking civilians. I think most Irish people think it is justified to attack soldier or other paramilitaries to free the country from occupation
 

Red

-------
Moderator
Nov 26, 2006
47,024
#23
I'm not about to get into any sort of debate on the rights or wrongs of how things are/were in terms of the division of Ireland and how the British acted.

Given the numbers of wrongs there were on both sides, I would have considered it better to try to draw a line and move on, rather than revisiting individual incidents since they almost inevitably involve opening up old issues.
 

The Curr

Senior Member
Feb 3, 2007
33,705
#24
Given the numbers of wrongs there were on both sides?

There were a lot more wrongs on their side. They are the ones who were (and are) in our country after all.
 

Seven

In bocca al lupo, Fabio.
Jun 25, 2003
39,348
#25
I'm not about to get into any sort of debate on the rights or wrongs of how things are/were in terms of the division of Ireland and how the British acted.

Given the numbers of wrongs there were on both sides, I would have considered it better to try to draw a line and move on, rather than revisiting individual incidents since they almost inevitably involve opening up old issues.
This is a good idea if both sides don't particularly care about the incident anymore, but I'd say that's not quite true for the Irish.
 

Red

-------
Moderator
Nov 26, 2006
47,024
#26
I have neither the desire nor sufficient knowledge of the history of it to get into that debate, Curr.
 

mikhail

Senior Member
Jan 24, 2003
9,576
#27
This is a good idea if both sides don't particularly care about the incident anymore, but I'd say that's not quite true for the Irish.
This is it. I don't particularly care, but there are plenty of people in Northern Ireland who lost friends and relatives that day. It's natural that they would value something like that.
 

JuveJay

Senior Signor
Moderator
Mar 6, 2007
75,029
#28
Utter Bullshit.


A people are responsible for their ancestors actions so long as reperation has not been made by any preceeding generation.

You can't say that it's not the UKs fault that they killed Millions of Irish People because it was an older generation, you must bear the cross of what you are a part of until you make things right, which the UK has not. You can try to gloss over what was done and shirk responsibility but you're a citizen of the United Kingdom, you are a part of the entity that commited the atrocities and having your attitude just makes relations worse. Like Mik said, by your logic you can't be proud of any achievement that predates your birth.

For 700 years the British Government brutally dictated over this country and nobody has appologised to us for any of it. Germany appolgised to the Jews, the USA to the Indians, why not the British to the Irish, or does it not matter anymore we can all just sweep everything under the carpet and move on.
The only reason this resonates with you at all is that there is still British 'occupation' in Ireland, otherwise it would just be another case of thousands of years of human civilisations becoming dominant over each other. Virtually every people of the world, including British several times, have been dicked over, raped, pillaged and murdered by another people but I don't find myself holding a grudge against Mr Mortensen of Copenhagen or Mr El Hadad of Casablanca for something their ancestors might have done to my ancestors. If it wasn't Britain it would be France or Spain, or whatever colonial power held ground. Let's get back to the real issue here, an atrocity that occured in 1972, not something that started when civilisation and society didn't bear any resemblance to what we would call it today.
 
OP
BIG DADDY!!!

BIG DADDY!!!

Senior Member
Mar 12, 2004
5,311
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #29
    To be fair my original post was about them apologising for all the atrocties that they commited in Ireland, from Cromwell to the Black n Tans.
    British atrocities in Ireland continued after 1921, the Free State seem to forget that, its as if they think the Northeners brought it on themselves.


    Don't get me wrong the IRA these days are dickheads but back when NI was first founded there was an Apartheid against Catholics by the state and something needed to be done.
    The PIRA defended the Catholic/Nationalist community with great courage from Loyalist mobs. (see Battle of St Matthew's) so I don't agree that they should be labeled dickheads.

    The problem began when they started attacking civilians. I think most Irish people think it is justified to attack soldier or other paramilitaries to free the country from occupation
    :agree:
     

    Ford Prefect

    Senior Member
    May 28, 2009
    10,557
    #30
    a terrorist is always a terrorist regardless of whether or not you agree with them.

    IZ im not going to reply to you because there isnt any point (neither of us will agree)
     

    Ford Prefect

    Senior Member
    May 28, 2009
    10,557
    #32
    and one mans freedom fighter is still a terrorist.

    Freedom fighters dont exist, they are just a perspective of terrorism.

    Whether or not you agree with what someone is doing makes no difference.
     

    IrishZebra

    Western Imperialist
    Jun 18, 2006
    23,327
    #35
    a terrorist is always a terrorist regardless of whether or not you agree with them.

    IZ im not going to reply to you because there isnt any point (neither of us will agree)
    No need to reply considering that using violence for political means is a VALID tactic. Terrorism is just that, states use it and no-state actors use it, it's no an illigitimate form of warfare, the frend resistence in WW2 were terrorists, the Nazi's were terrorists, Tony Blair was a terrorist, if those being slaughtered in the Sudan take up arms against the militias and fight back in order to change the government so they stop getting murdered they are terrorists.

    It's the same situation with your tirade against racism, you've bought into the media and foreign policy elite driven version of events and accepted societal standards that are held up as right but rarely if ever practicsed.


    The only reason this resonates with you at all is that there is still British 'occupation' in Ireland, otherwise it would just be another case of thousands of years of human civilisations becoming dominant over each other. Virtually every people of the world, including British several times, have been dicked over, raped, pillaged and murdered by another people but I don't find myself holding a grudge against Mr Mortensen of Copenhagen or Mr El Hadad of Casablanca for something their ancestors might have done to my ancestors. If it wasn't Britain it would be France or Spain, or whatever colonial power held ground. Let's get back to the real issue here, an atrocity that occured in 1972, not something that started when civilisation and society didn't bear any resemblance to what we would call it today.
    Thanks for letting me know why my opinions and feelings resonate with me.
    I suggest you read about the history of ireland in the 20th century, or was civilsation not around in 1920 when British soldiers entered a GAA football game and killed 31 innocent people? Or Collusion between the British Army and Loyalist Paramilitaries that lasted until the late 1980s?

    I don't know where your post came from cosidering you're a very good poster here but not only is it ignorant it's also effectively nullifying abuses that happened less than 25 years ago.

    Like I said, an official appology and admission of guilt would have a significant impact of both communities north and south

    and one mans freedom fighter is still a terrorist.

    Freedom fighters dont exist, they are just a perspective of terrorism.

    Whether or not you agree with what someone is doing makes no difference.
    Thactherite.
     

    JuveJay

    Senior Signor
    Moderator
    Mar 6, 2007
    75,029
    #36
    Well I directly referenced 1972 and you were the one to mention '700 years' which is where I took my reference from, but perhaps I should stay out of this thread from now on as I am more of an historian than a politicist and maybe don't choose my words as well as I should.
     

    IrishZebra

    Western Imperialist
    Jun 18, 2006
    23,327
    #38
    Well I directly referenced 1972 and you were the one to mention '700 years' which is where I took my reference from, but perhaps I should stay out of this thread from now on as I am more of an historian than a politicist and maybe don't choose my words as well as I should.
    To be fair you sort of mention specifics and then go more general but in all honesty there's no point apoligising for doing X and Y if you did Z as well and it was much worse.

    Look, I don't think it's too much to ask to have the monarch/PM say something along the lines.

    "We're deeply sorry for the pain and suffering inflicted on the Irish people throughout the history of British colonialism, we accept that abhorent behaviour and atrocities were committed which the government and people of the United Kingdom regret sincerely an accept wholeheartedily our responsiblity and involement therin. In the spirit of freindship between the two closest of neighbours we feel it necessery to engage with the past both good and bad in order to facilitate better relations in the future."


    I'm not asking for Northern Ireland back (although at some point that'd be swell) or reperations just an apology.
     

    Ford Prefect

    Senior Member
    May 28, 2009
    10,557
    #40
    Realism isn't a politcal ideology it's a descriptive theory of IR under anarchic scope conditions.
    google said:
    Definitions of realism on the Web:

    * the attribute of accepting the facts of life and favoring practicality and literal truth
    * reality: the state of being actual or real; "the reality of his situation slowly dawned on him"
    I didnt mean IR realism.
     

    Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)