Black/White (26 Viewers)

[ßöмßäяðîëя]

++ [ originally posted by swag ] ++
"WET" should be a porn channel, that's all I know.

DA!


But I do agree with Fabi.

 

Buy on AliExpress.com

[Snoop]

++ [ originally posted by swag ] ++
"WET" should be a porn channel, that's all I know.

 

[Dragon]

++ [ originally posted by Don Bes ] ++
of course they would

Then, why the B.E.T. is around? EVERYTHING they show, including the commercials, is with black people. Isnt this racist?
I found unbelievable that a commercial for L'Oreal, for example, in any normal channel would have three different-race models, but in BET the commercial is only with black models

 

[ßöмßäяðîëя]

++ [ originally posted by 674083912 ] ++


Then, why the B.E.T. is around? EVERYTHING they show, including the commercials, is with black people. Isnt this racist?
I found unbelievable that a commercial for L'Oreal, for example, in any normal channel would have three different-race models, but in BET the commercial is only with black models

See, this is what I am talking about, reverse racism.

 

[swag]

The difference is whether you're in the majority/socially-recognized ruling majority or not. I think it's shortsighted to think that all blacks are alike and that they can be targeted with some uniform channel programming.

Even so, I think it's even more ludicrous to think that such a wide swath of the concept of "white people" makes any demographic sense to begin with. The diversity of social background, classes, and experiences of people under the "white" umbrella is too wide to make any cohesive, unilateral presumptions, IMO.

For example, you take the son of Italian immigrants and the daughter of Irish immigrants and say that they have that much in common because of just their lighter skin color? Really?

The whole concept of "white" people is a false construction, IMO, as it really means anybody who isn't black, who isn't Asian, who isn't too light of a Latino, etc. And any collective people defined more by who they aren't than by who they are is a joke.

Which, IMO, is why the concept of a "White Entertainment Television" channel would be considered oddly racist. I wouldn't see it as racist so much because I don't see "white" as really being a race, per se. But to the degree that society defines whites by what they are not rather than what they cohesively are, then by definition it's about exclusion rather than inclusion. And exclusion television doesn't exactly come off as socially acceptable.

 

[Snoop]

++ [ originally posted by 674083912 ] ++


Then, why the B.E.T. is around? EVERYTHING they show, including the commercials, is with black people. Isnt this racist?
I found unbelievable that a commercial for L'Oreal, for example, in any normal channel would have three different-race models, but in BET the commercial is only with black models

but think about it this way,Mtvs and VH1 they lately started to show Hip-hop and Rap.there were hunderds of black artists that their works weren't showing on TV right?so they had their own channel.BTW,when was BET created?

 

[Lawnchair Bes]

yes but that can be applied to black people too, jamaicans are quite different from south africans

 

[Snoop]

++ [ originally posted by swag ] ++
The difference is whether you're in the majority/socially-recognized ruling majority or not. I think it's shortsighted to think that all blacks are alike and that they can be targeted with some uniform channel programming.

Even so, I think it's even more ludicrous to think that such a wide swath of the concept of "white people" makes any demographic sense to begin with. The diversity of social background, classes, and experiences of people under the "white" umbrella is too wide to make any cohesive, unilateral presumptions, IMO.

For example, you take the son of Italian immigrants and the daughter of Irish immigrants and say that they have that much in common because of just their lighter skin color? Really?

The whole concept of "white" people is a false construction, IMO, as it really means anybody who isn't black, who isn't Asian, who isn't too light of a Latino, etc. And any collective people defined more by who they aren't than by who they are is a joke.

Which, IMO, is why the concept of a "White Entertainment Television" channel would be considered oddly racist. I wouldn't see it as racist so much because I don't see "white" as really being a race, per se. But to the degree that society defines whites by what they are not rather than what they cohesively are, then by definition it's about exclusion rather than inclusion. And exclusion television doesn't exactly come off as socially acceptable.

that's what I am talking about

 

[Enron]

++ [ originally posted by Don Bes ] ++
yes but that can be applied to black people too, jamaicans are quite different from south africans

i personally believe that BET really stands for Black Exploitment Television. Coming from a mixed race family I dont see anyway that BET helps out the black race.

 

[Dragon]

++ [ originally posted by Don Bes ] ++
yes but that can be applied to black people too, jamaicans are quite different from south africans

Exactly.

Im fairly white, and in my country I am considered white, but when I go to the USA Im considered "Hispanic"

 

[Lawnchair Bes]

++ [ originally posted by Enron ] ++


i personally believe that BET really stands for Black Exploitment Television. Coming from a mixed race family I dont see anyway that BET helps out the black race.

its like they basically embrace the stereotype.

 

[swag]

++ [ originally posted by Don Bes ] ++



its like they basically embrace the stereotype.

But unlike a, say, Dave Chappelle, they aren't self-aware of themselves doing that.

 

[ßöмßäяðîëя]

yea, they embrace it all too often even without knowledge of doing such.

 

[Lawnchair Bes]

++ [ originally posted by swag ] ++


But unlike a, say, Dave Chappelle, they aren't self-aware of themselves doing that.

thats why dave is there, so that he makes fun of those who embrace the stereotype

 

[Layce Erayce]

++ [ originally posted by Menace ] ++
I've done dumber things

you wouldnt beat paris hilton's current boyfriend.

 

[ßöмßäяðîëя]

Yea, he probably wouldn't.

 

[Menace]

++ [ originally posted by Jigga ] ++



I suppose you know him well than I do Jeekster. Wondered why everyone called him that.

No he doesn't, Jeeks you ass kisser

++ [ originally posted by snoop ] ++


yeah,but Some of them,treat them like they are ones till this day,and I don't think it will change as long as we have retard people like you that categorize humans (because of their skin color)..


someone close this stupid thread

Blah blah i don't

 

[Enron]

maybe we should categorize people by smell or original hair color or how many times they blink in a minute?

 

[ßöмßäяðîëя]

Or their wang size.


Hunny, don't talk to that seven-incher, you know what they want......

 

[Menace]

The magnificent seven inches :dielaugh:

I don't categorize people, i am the dude without an ID remember, i am not the asshole that judges people by there race or cream, i don't give a fvck about that stuff.