How about if you are a striker and go past a defender 3 times but do not score any goals are you also judged to be a hero?
hey, even before c.ronaldo scored a decent amount of goals per season he was rated high
what about quaresma ... fancy tricks with few end product ... still high rated
just read the "i want this player in juve"-thread and you will find huge amounts of players that do tricks but fuck up in front of goal or just dont deliver
Excuse me but your comparison is just totally unfair, why not compare a defender making 3 goal bound clearances to a striker's hattrick? That is fairer.
ok, to be more fair the comparision should evaluate success on what is achievable by the player and not only coincidence ...
there are not always chances to put your leg between a shot that is goal bound (if i understood you correct) for a defender ... but a chance is a chance, meaning the possibility to score is pretty good. a striker can create a chance for himself when he has the ball and only a defender on the direct way to goal.
as defender you can not create that chances to make clearances, at least if you do not deliberately give the attacker the opportunity to shoot
it is right, that in defence the physical aspect of the game can help you much so it is easy if you have the right physique to be a good defender ...
but on the other hand as striker if you have pace you also have the advantage on your side without having to be great technically
often you use the "duel statistics" (google translation for "zweikampfstatistik") for the judgement of defenders and why should that be wrong ?