Bürke's Calciopoli v Farsiopoli Thread (11 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Apr 12, 2004
77,165
#1
I am just going to quote the things I want answered from the other thread, and members can respond if they wish in here....since I'm not allowed to post in the other thread.

Here is my original question:

There is no farsiopoli.So we head back to the commercials.
said the admitted Interista...how's our title sit in your trophy case?
Very lovely indeed:)

Now I get the "trophy" thing, but did Salman admit to being an Interista, or are you just saying that, Gsol, because you are trying to dis him because he and a lot of others think you are a crackpot?

Well I hate Inter and I think there was no Farsiopoli....am I an Interista by default, if so, you are lying because I hate Inter.
 

Buy on AliExpress.com
OP
ßöмßäяðîëя
Apr 12, 2004
77,165
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #3
    Actually, I find it very interesting. I like conspiracies :eyebrows:
    And I do think some weird things happened that particular summer.
    Like what? Did you see a hot girl or something? What other conspiracies do you like/believe in?
    What was the question Burke, sorry but I usually don't read your comments.

    State it again
    It's above.
     
    OP
    ßöмßäяðîëя
    Apr 12, 2004
    77,165
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #8
    Burke
    If this was your question then the answer is;

    The rules was changed duiring the trial and then changed back after. That means that Juve were wrongfully sentenced because they could only be sentenced in accordance with the rules at the time of the infraction.

    If the origial question was regarding the Interista you'll have to ask him to clarify. He has admitted here to being one. If he's lying only he can say.

    If your question is regarding changing the past, I answered that. The decisions are being appealed but even without the appeals, knowing the truth is important to some so let them hear it.
    That's not the question.
    Beside clearing Juventus image what other benefit can we expect if the appeal is successful , financial compensation, revoked title from 04/05 given back ... etc. Could you explain more to these what if's ?
    That would be cool to take the Scudetto back from those Inter nutfucks.
    i just hope that it gets our reputation back. also we better get the titles back that would show up inter . lol
    Yea, but this isn't football manager, you can't just change it. Your name will be tarnished for history, no matter what.
     
    Aug 30, 2006
    510
    #10
    ßöмßäяdîëя;1496175 said:
    That's not the question.

    That would be cool to take the Scudetto back from those Inter nutfucks.

    Yea, but this isn't football manager, you can't just change it. Your name will be tarnished for history, no matter what.
    yeah but people will know that we were wrongly judged if this gets out.
     

    HelterSkelter

    Senior Member
    Apr 15, 2005
    20,600
    #11
    I did tell Gaysol that im an Interista in that thread.Hell id even say that im a Jew if Gaysol said that he's a muslim - All to get under his skin.Does saying that make me a Jew or an Interista?Well if it pisses Gsol off,then id say it again and again.
     

    Boudz

    Mercato Tourist
    Aug 1, 2002
    2,608
    #12
    Why you guys so hard on the guy? He comes in with an opinion about a topic and unlike alot of people here, he backs up what he says with sources, documents, articles.
    So your dissing him cos he has an opinion thats different from yours? Where's the free speech?
    You don't like what he says, don't read it! SIMPLE AS THAT! add him to your ignore list. If you're gonna shoo away any new member who has something interesting to say, this forum is gonna be left with meaningless talk like how drunk someone got last night! or the official drama thread!

    Many of us enjoy reading the guys posts, don't ruin it for the rest of us!
     
    OP
    ßöмßäяðîëя
    Apr 12, 2004
    77,165
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #14
    No...U tell me, Andy from USA...:rofl: So why r u against gsol or his arguments? Why don't you acknowledge his findings and posts? Why are most of the so calld Juve fans against him on this forum? Tell me that,ya dunce... Every one who possess a common sense, knows that the trial was a joke...

    No video evidence was allowed to be used by the defense and no witnesses were allowed to be brought forth + no wire taps were heard in court...So that we couldn't proof our innocence... Than changing the rules duiring the trial and then changing tham back after it's over...Does this look like a fair trial to you???? You must admit that is a bit shady


    @Cronios...well put:toast: :tup:
    You are a fucking retard.

    If you actually simply read my post instead of just looking at my location, you wouldn't have had to write any of that. It might be a little difficult for you to comprehend, but one can believe that the trial against us was unfair while still keep an open mind that we may not be entirely innocent.
    Word, don't listen to that cockmonger, he is a fucking retard.

    Andy I’m not a mod but you have been told by a mod to stay on topic and continue to drift. How many messages need to be deleted before you guys learn?
    Me having no life is a stupid assumption. Having cleared 25,000 it’s obvious that you devote plenty of your spare time to Juventus as well. I read in my spare time. It hasn’t kept me from maintaining a job, getting a post graduate education and getting married while maintaining all of my friends. This past year given the publications of trial documents, rather than reading other books I read trial documents. As a result I am far more equipped than many to approach this topic.
    My position is that Juventus were guilty of article 1 violations and should have been fined and penalized at least 5 points. The relegation was part of another agenda and unlawful given the manner in which the sentence, trial, and evidence were structured.
    If all the legal documents that state no match fixing, all the wiretaps that conclude no match fixing, and all the judges admitting no article 6 violations haven’t convinced you an others that the relegation and stripping of titles was a farce than there is little more I can do. Needless to say I will be more than happy to provide whatever answers I can to satisfy your curiosities. If and when I am asked a question that I have no answer for I admit it. Such a question has not yet been posed to me.
    shut up

    Cronios, friendly question.

    What were we guilty of?
    Exactly....

    +rep again
     

    HelterSkelter

    Senior Member
    Apr 15, 2005
    20,600
    #15
    Denco comes up with an opinion too in that thread.I dont bash him.Why?Because he uses common sense,unlike Gsol who is hell bent on clinging on to conpiracies from prehistoric times.That fact that he brings up documents makes everyone think that he's some really authentic guy who was virtually present in the courtrooms when the trial took place.If he really was such a bigshot,he wouldnt be wasting his time prancing about on an internet forum trying to make believers out of all of us.

    The worst part is that some people are even ready to believe his heartbreaking tale of how Juventus were hard done by and how innocent we were.People dont have the balls to admit that their club DID infact cheat.They'd rather stay in their comfort zone and think that they were treated unfairly.
     
    OP
    ßöмßäяðîëя
    Apr 12, 2004
    77,165
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #16
    Yo Sal I know he is just going to ask you to prove that to him. You need to then just repond with the same thing...and when he tries to, just be like, no a suit and a high court of the land found us guilty.....so we are guilty.
     

    Boudz

    Mercato Tourist
    Aug 1, 2002
    2,608
    #18
    Again you dont like what he says, the way he says it then ignore! Because I am one of those people who believes Juve were victims, I'm not saying we are innocent, I'm saying why are we cast as the evil doers while Inter is an angel! This seasons refereeing is proof of Gsol's theories and you guys should keep an open ear. I'm not saying he's the all-knowing.
     

    HelterSkelter

    Senior Member
    Apr 15, 2005
    20,600
    #19
    Again you dont like what he says, the way he says it then ignore! Because I am one of those people who believes Juve were victims, I'm not saying we are innocent, I'm saying why are we cast as the evil doers while Inter is an angel! This seasons refereeing is proof of Gsol's theories and you guys should keep an open ear. I'm not saying he's the all-knowing.
    Yes i dont like what he says.But i cant ignore it.

    Maybe you dont think he's the all-knowning,but people suck up to him on that thread like he's a messiah.You say that we are victims,yet you also say that we were not innocent.How?Maybe you people do know that we are infact guilty,but you just dont have the courage to admit it.
     

    Boudz

    Mercato Tourist
    Aug 1, 2002
    2,608
    #20
    admitting FULL responsibility to a crime that many others were involved to isn't a sign of courage!
    I'm sick of the image that only Juve are the bad people theory! We were involved in shady business but why are we the only ones being punished, thats what makes us victims! So whenever an Interista or a Milanista come and talk shit to me about Juve, thanks to Gsol I now have ammo to shut them up by showing them that their teams were involved too.
     
    Status
    Not open for further replies.

    Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 11)