well, while sarri is right on most of his points, he forgets that actually many talk about infrastructure. too bad that besides the corruption, the administration is italy's biggest enemy. it's a shame that iirc only two clubs (juve, cagliari) built new stadiums, and very few renovated their stadiums more or less recently (udinese, napoli, bologna, brescia, sassuolo/reggiana, there are probably a few i don't recall, but the list is very short nonetheless). also, the list of the stadiums that can accommodate uefa matches is extremely short. if italy were to host the euros anytime soon they'd be in trouble. the most important underlying issue is the ownership: very few clubs own their stadium, and the local administration is either corrupt or simply impotent (or both), making the renovations and constructions borderline impossible. inda/milan and roma/lazio want new venues since decades, and all started projects proved to be dead ends ffs
what i don't get at all is that how come that figc and la lega are powerful organizations but they still can't get the wheels turning. and it's not like calcio isn't popular enough in italy, it's still the most important sport and a source of national pride, so it's completely unacceptable how they can't solve a simple issue like that. this situation benefits no one yet it's not solved at all. and it's not even a question of money: the very few examples of new or fundamentally renovated stadiums show that these investments are profitable.
what i don't get at all is that how come that figc and la lega are powerful organizations but they still can't get the wheels turning. and it's not like calcio isn't popular enough in italy, it's still the most important sport and a source of national pride, so it's completely unacceptable how they can't solve a simple issue like that. this situation benefits no one yet it's not solved at all. and it's not even a question of money: the very few examples of new or fundamentally renovated stadiums show that these investments are profitable.
