Arthur (13 Viewers)

[campionesidd]

‼️ "The residual value of #Arthur is 43mln€: this means you can only send him on loan. I believe he'll leave."

[Romeo Agresti - Juventibus via @AroundJuventus]

I never understood this. What’s the difference between letting a useless player run down his contract and selling him for an amortized loss?
If anything selling is better because it saves wages. Ticinomics is retarded.

 

Buy on AliExpress.com

[Bianconero81]

This bowl of foul medames (fava beans) is worth more than Arturd

 

[Bjerknes]

‼️ "The residual value of #Arthur is 43mln€: this means you can only send him on loan. I believe he'll leave."

[Romeo Agresti - Juventibus via @AroundJuventus]

By the way, for those of you who aren’t finance gurus.

Residual value, also known as
salvage value, is the estimated
value of a fixed asset at the end
of its useful economic life.


Arthur was a depreciated asset as soon as Tici handed him the paperwork.

 

[Bianconero81]

By the way, for those of you who aren’t finance gurus.

Residual value, also known as
salvage value, is the estimated
value of a fixed asset at the end
of its useful economic life.


Arthur was a depreciated asset as soon as Tici handed him the paperwork.

Arturd is like a used car or a used laptop. As soon as he was bought, his value depreciated rapidly, plummeting to almost zero residual value. He's our own Luna.

 

[ZultanIbra]

Goodluck finding buyer with 43m price tag, the only destination is shaktar donetsk, they love brazilian trash.

 

[X Æ A-12]

This bowl of foul medames (fava beans) is worth more than Arturd

 

[Robee]

I never understood this. What’s the difference between letting a useless player run down his contract and selling him for an amortized loss?
If anything selling is better because it saves wages. Ticinomics is retarded.

Taxes.

 

[Cerval]

This bowl of foul medames (fava beans) is worth more than Arturd

I love these

 

[Bianconero81]

I love these

Where are you from btw? You seem to understand Arabic and like Fool Medames

 

[JCK]

This bowl of foul medames (fava beans) is worth more than Arturd

 

[Bianconero_Aus]

Goodluck finding buyer with 43m price tag, the only destination is shaktar donetsk, they love brazilian trash.

No one will be stupid enough to buy this busted flush. He’ll be loaned out until the end of his contract. Sad reality. But at least we are slowly trying to rid ourselves of many of Paratici’s rejects.

 

[JuvePerSempre10]

By the way, for those of you who aren’t finance gurus.

Residual value, also known as
salvage value, is the estimated
value of a fixed asset at the end
of its useful economic life.


Arthur was a depreciated asset as soon as Tici handed him the paperwork.

I’m pretty sure it’s a translation error and he meant book value.

 

[Siamak]

#Arthur is first in the list of transferable players. He in turn would like to change environment, but what complicates everything is the imposed cost from the super-exchange with Miralem #Pjanic and his super salary which substantially reduce the opportunities in the mercato. For months, #Arsenal have shown interest in him, even #Monaco made some moves: the bianconeri do not exclude a loan or an eventual exchange with interesting profiles.

[Corriere dello Sport via @AroundJuventus]

 

[Boksic]

 

[.zero]

The good times never end do they

 

[duranfj]

I never understood this. What’s the difference between letting a useless player run down his contract and selling him for an amortized loss?
If anything selling is better because it saves wages. Ticinomics is retarded.

Juve is a public company. Register losses matters a lot. However I understand the logic, why to have an asset register at 43m when he real value is -5m per year (or whatever his salary is)

 

[beowulf]

Juve is a public company. Register losses matters a lot. However I understand the logic, why to have an asset register at 43m when he real value is -5m per year (or whatever his salary is)

Isn't it more a FFP thing? I don't know the FFP rules, but if so (say he's sold for 15m euros best case scenario), and Juve records a 28m euro loss, it would really hurt their ability to purchase players I imagine. Cashflow is less a concern than the net loss in this "modern football"

 

[duranfj]

Isn't it more a FFP thing? I don't know the FFP rules, but if so (say he's sold for 15m euros best case scenario), and Juve records a 28m euro loss, it would really hurt their ability to purchase players I imagine. Cashflow is less a concern than the net loss in this "modern football"

FFP rule too. Register a lost of 43m for just one player is a lot

 

[Ronn]

FFP rule too. Register a lost of 43m for just one player is a lot

I thought FFP is gone. We eventually should keep our transfer and wages expenditure to 70% of our revenue, so getting rid of high wage players actually helps.

 

[Mike-e-y]

Having this guy in the club is a net loss. We fail at football with him in the squad.
If we can’t absorb the loss then send the cunt out on a loan until the end of his contract for paid wages and a small annual fee.

What a disgusting footballer he is