Arkadiusz Milik (60 Viewers)

[Paolino]

This is even more ridiculous than renewing Arthur’s contract.
but why don’t they clearly say what his problem is?Even if it were an ACL injury, he should’ve recovered by now.

 

Buy on AliExpress.com

[Lion]

This is even more ridiculous than renewing Arthur’s contract.
but why don’t they clearly say what his problem is?Even if it were an ACL injury, he should’ve recovered by now.

It’s not surprising is it? Juve hiding stuff. They knew about Fagioli gambling and hid it and even supported him. They defrauded their investors in 2021 scandal. The calciopoli scandal. The 2 youth kids that drowned on company grounds scandal.

It’s time to admit juve is a scummy club. It’s the nestle of football

 

[Bianconero_Aus]

 

[Rockets]

Sign injury prone players with obligation to extend, ladies and gentlemen, JJ.

 

[Zzak]

I don't see how it benefits Milik though

He probably got a significant sign on bonus which is not mentioned. These reports usually only mention the salary.

 

[DAiDEViL]

So we "extended him" but just splitting his salary into two seasons to spread the cost out and hope his lower AAV will make him more enticing to loan out.

Fail to see why folks are so pissed over this.

 

[Tak!]

When accountants that don't know what real money is runs the club. What. A. Joke.

 

[Siamak]

His contract was probably extended so wouldn't lose him as free agent, That's why I believe this club running by a a bunch of idiotic puppets. Who in their right mind would pay for a player who is constantly injured and who plays less than the number of games on one hand in a season? There's no guarantee he won't get injured again after he comes back from injury.

 

[HelterSkelter]

Top player.

Good move.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Paolino]

The funny part is, Milik is our best striker when fit and that says it all about the club.

 

[Knowah]

His contract was probably extended so wouldn't lose him as free agent, That's why I believe this club running by a a bunch of idiotic puppets. Who in their right mind would pay for a player who is constantly injured and who plays less than the number of games on one hand in a season? There's no guarantee he won't get injured again after he comes back from injury.

Is this a joke?

- His contract was 3.00 million for one more year.
- That's hard to pawn off on teams to loan him for smaller clubs.
- We've "extended" his contract 1 more year (two years) but BOTH years now at 1.5m
- This allows us to spread that 3.00m hit across two years
- AND this allows when shopping him for a loan, smaller clubs will now be more easily able to cover more of his salary since its only 1.50m vs 3.00m

This isn't that hard. This is us lowering his impact on our wage bill and hoping the lower Annual Average Value of 1.50 will make him easier to loan out at hopefully the entire salary. Whereas, if we loaned him out at 3.00m salary for one more year and the loaning team paid HALF, we'd still be paying him 1.50m (half) to fuck off. Now, we hope we can send him out and retain maybe only 30% of his wages (now only 450k) and also opened up the clubs that could possibly get him due to his lower annual wages.

 

[Siamak]

Is this a joke?

- His contract was 3.00 million for one more year.
- That's hard to pawn off on teams to loan him for smaller clubs.
- We've "extended" his contract 1 more year (two years) but BOTH years now at 1.5m
- This allows us to spread that 3.00m hit across two years
- AND this allows when shopping him for a loan, smaller clubs will now be more easily able to cover more of his salary since its only 1.50m vs 3.00m

This isn't that hard. This is us lowering his impact on our wage bill and hoping the lower Annual Average Value of 1.50 will make him easier to loan out at hopefully the entire salary. Whereas, if we loaned him out at 3.00m salary for one more year and the loaning team paid HALF, we'd still be paying him 1.50m (half) to fuck off. Now, we hope we can send him out and retain maybe only 30% of his wages (now only 450k) and also opened up the clubs that could possibly get him due to his lower annual wages.

How can we loan him to another team when he is always injured and unable to play? What team is willing to take a player who is injured?

- - - Updated - - -

 

[Knowah]

How can we loan him to another team when he is always injured and unable to play? What team is willing to take a player who is injured?

Hopefully he comes back from his injury and a bottom table Serie A club or French club or club looking to get promoted in Serie B will take a risk because he has some talent against farmers.

But even if he doesn't, his cost this year is half of what it was and thus we've "freed up" 1.5m for this year with this extension and spreading out of his wages.

 

[MikeM]

Is this a joke?

- His contract was 3.00 million for one more year.
- That's hard to pawn off on teams to loan him for smaller clubs.
- We've "extended" his contract 1 more year (two years) but BOTH years now at 1.5m
- This allows us to spread that 3.00m hit across two years
- AND this allows when shopping him for a loan, smaller clubs will now be more easily able to cover more of his salary since its only 1.50m vs 3.00m

This isn't that hard. This is us lowering his impact on our wage bill and hoping the lower Annual Average Value of 1.50 will make him easier to loan out at hopefully the entire salary. Whereas, if we loaned him out at 3.00m salary for one more year and the loaning team paid HALF, we'd still be paying him 1.50m (half) to fuck off. Now, we hope we can send him out and retain maybe only 30% of his wages (now only 450k) and also opened up the clubs that could possibly get him due to his lower annual wages.

What about sending the message that if you're a useless player you'll end up homeless?

 

[Knowah]

What about sending the message that if you're a useless player you'll end up homeless?

I mean, welcome to the real world where contracts are usually honored.

We're probably paying this guy 3m whether we like it or not (unless we can loan him out and get a team to pay some of his wages, which again with a lower annual figure opens up the possible clubs that could afford his total or partial wages). So if its all 3m for 25/26 season or 1.5 for 25/26 and 1.5 for 26/27 its a still contract.

What are you recommending? We breach our contract with him and just not pay him? An interesting idea. Wow, wonder what the points deduction would be for that. Fifteen again?

 

[MikeM]

I mean, welcome to the real world where contracts are usually honored.

We're probably paying this guy 3m whether we like it or not (unless we can loan him out and get a team to pay some of his wages, which again with a lower annual figure opens up the possible clubs that could afford his total or partial wages). So if its all 3m for 25/26 season or 1.5 for 25/26 and 1.5 for 26/27 its a still contract.

What are you recommending? We breach our contract with him and just not pay him? An interesting idea. Wow, wonder what the points deduction would be for that. Fifteen again?

Ya pay it all next year and tell him to fuck off. Go rehab on Salernitana not billion dollar facilities. Maybe some players will wake up if they see that. And that's one spot on the roster where you could put someone useful. Double positive

 

[DAiDEViL]

Ya pay it all next year and tell him to fuck off. Go rehab on Salernitana not billion dollar facilities. Maybe some players will wake up if they see that. And that's one spot on the roster where you could put someone useful. Double positive

Radicalized Mike is savage.

 

[MikeM]

Radicalized Mike is savage.

4312 was one thing but turning into Accounting Simulator is another

 

[Stephan]

I dont understand this. Of course we are most likely (surely, right?) getting rid of Vlahovic this summer. And im not sure if we are going to make a move for Muani. But i have no faith or belief anymore in Milik in a 38 league game season.

 

[Salvo]

Is this just what we did with Arthur?