Are you with selling Tiago on January? (1 Viewer)

Are you with selling Tiago on January?

  • Yes

  • No


Results are only viewable after voting.

Boksic

Senior Member
May 11, 2005
14,300
#4
it depends on a number of things. I'm largely against selling Tiago but if he was to be sold in order to fund the signing Diego then i would be relatively happy.
 
Jun 13, 2007
7,233
#5
it depends on a number of things. I'm largely against selling Tiago but if he was to be sold in order to fund the signing Diego then i would be relatively happy.
I say give him a year . If he does badly sell him for Tiago , but right now , selling Tiago would be a very stupid thing to do .
 

HelterSkelter

Senior Member
Apr 15, 2005
20,591
#6
Im not a fan of his,but we should keep him until June atleast and give him a proper chance.If he doesnt deliver,then sell him by all means.Even if we sell him in January,there is no way in hell that the likes of Diego,Lampard,Van Der Vaart etc will be sold then too.They are top players and expecting the teams to sell them halfway through the season isnt realistic.
 

Boksic

Senior Member
May 11, 2005
14,300
#8
I say give him a year . If he does badly sell him for Tiago , but right now , selling Tiago would be a very stupid thing to do .
yeah a year sounds suitable, provided that that we play him. If he is just going to be wasted then maybe we should cash in.I truelly hope CR starts giving him more playing time, he helped turn the game against Parma!
 

swag

L'autista
Administrator
Sep 23, 2003
84,750
#11
The problem isn't all Tiago. It's also our stubborn inability to find a way for a player like Tiago to prove his worth or not in the team. Replace Tiago and it could be the same situation with the next guy in line.
 

.zero

★ ★ ★
Aug 8, 2006
82,830
#13
tiago isn't the problem but keeping him here on a squad where he doesn't seem to fit and with a coach that doesn't know how to utilize him is a problem.

and ranieri is a moron
 
OP

ReBeL

The Jackal
Jan 14, 2005
22,871
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread Starter #17
    For those who voted yes, may we know why?
    because this debate for whether he stays or not is not for the good of the team. The club needs to be more united to achieve its goals, not dividing because a player the coach doesn't play. So, the decision on playing him more regularly or selling him should be taken in January, and not deferred to July.
     
    Jun 13, 2007
    7,233
    #18
    because this debate for whether he stays or not is not for the good of the team. The club needs to be more united to achieve its goals, not dividing because a player the coach doesn't play. So, the decision on playing him more regularly or selling him should be taken in January, and not deferred to July.
    Im sure him not playing isn't affecting the club at all . I think he should stay under the condition that he actually plays , and I think Ranieri will finally come to his senses and finally play him . I think it would be a huge waste to sell him now , in fact he has impressed in the last two games he played . Ranieri only has himself to blame for not playing him .
     

    Cronios

    Juventolog
    Jun 7, 2004
    27,519
    #19
    Selling Tiago? hmm it depends,
    if we swap him with a quality Barca CB, yes,
    if we get enough money to buy Ballack or VDV, why not.
    But selling him right now in the middle of the season without even getting the chance to prove him self, NO
    Esp for a lower price, like what Barca offers...
     

    Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)