i wouldn't blame secco on this one. media just stated a nearly done deal when it still wasn't. i can understand spinelli in wanting a player in exchange for giving up candreva now. he has an agreement on a year-long loan and will hand him over to us after half a season.
but, what do you think about his rumoured market value? 8 million for a co-ownership? same price as d'ago or snijder?
He's just being a bitch the deal is between us and Udinese he is just on loan at Livorno, as part of the loan deal if there was a recall option then he can't stop it
i wouldn't blame secco on this one. media just stated a nearly done deal when it still wasn't. i can understand spinelli in wanting a player in exchange for giving up candreva now. he has an agreement on a year-long loan and will hand him over to us after half a season.
but, what do you think about his rumoured market value? 8 million for a co-ownership? same price as d'ago or snijder?
DP can play as AMC, Camo when back fit can do it also, if they want Gio on loan until the end of the season, and Gio wants to be loaned out, I wouldn't hesitate.
What are the odds of having everyone available with the past 2 seasons of injuries? That's my point Cheshire, we needed squad depth now more than every which is why we recalled all these loans. I supposed if Gio went then we could "use" Yago as a backup for the backups? Just a thought....
of course we did, but as long as we want diego to play effective and considering the amount of strikers we have, we should play with diego behind two strikers. at best two fast guys who create a lot of space.