I can excuse you but you won't like it.
You either didn't read a single word of what I said earlier or simply failed to comprehend it.
When you have a 36 yo QB with a 0-2 p-off record being touted as a SB contender, one of the following is true:
1) Palmer is the unluckiest, excellent Qb in the history of the NFL or
2) Palmer is mediocre Qb thrown in a really good situation - great WRs, great ground game, great defense.
I'll take my chances with the latter. That's why I said that if GB establishes a somewhat decent running game, while the D manages to limit the ground game of the Cards, Rodgers will have a chance to win it despite his obviously inferior WRs (now they have lost Cobb too) simply because he is a superior QB to Carson freaking Palmer.