Nothing at all against you, Reese but that article is based on the same quotations from Amauri from two days ago but some spice has been added to it; and of course the flashy "cliché" title.
Lothar Matthaus wore the number 10 throughout his career, even when he was switched to sweeper. He was pretty nasty back there with the ball, so I don't mind a sweeper wearing the number 10 because sometimes he's the field general.
Well, Matthaus is a different story. Anyway, Gallas is not exactly a Matthaus. You're right, there are some exceptions if Scirea or Baresi used the #10 I wouldn't be bothered at all.
Lothar Matthaus wore the number 10 throughout his career, even when he was switched to sweeper. He was pretty nasty back there with the ball, so I don't mind a sweeper wearing the number 10 because sometimes he's the field general.
But with Matthaus it was a different case, he wouldn't give his number. Speakign of which, I would love to see Nedved as a sweeper, can you imagine the passes coming from behind?
Lothar Matthaus wore the number 10 throughout his career, even when he was switched to sweeper. He was pretty nasty back there with the ball, so I don't mind a sweeper wearing the number 10 because sometimes he's the field general.
It used to be quite common for a sweeper to wear No.10. I think the tradition died when teams stopped playing systems that used a real libero type sweeper.
But with Matthaus it was a different case, he wouldn't give his number. Speakign of which, I would love to see Nedved as a sweeper, can you imagine the passes coming from behind?
It used to be quite common for a sweeper to wear No.10. I think the tradition died when teams stopped playing systems that used a real libero type sweeper.