it will be funny to see amauris big head in our team. i think hes good but i am sceptical about these players who only become good aged 26+. and hes a mercenary without a doubt.
Buy on AliExpress.com
Amauri Carvalho de Oliveira (49 Viewers)
- Thread starter Dominic
- Start date
- Status
Buy on AliExpress.com
You are probably right that Gila is better than Palladino but there is not much of a difference to me. I thought we are looking for a clear upgrade? I even think Palladino has more raw talent. Gila (even though he bagged quite enough of goals in Serie A) is just declining instead of growing and gets worse with every season. In Champions League and for the Azzurri he was completely worthless.
I surely won't eat up my words, as I always maintained Iaquinta and Sissoko were quality players. Try to find my old posts, I welcomed those players with open arms. Hence I didn't have any sudden change of opinion like many did when they jumped on their bandwagons.
I surely won't eat up my words, as I always maintained Iaquinta and Sissoko were quality players. Try to find my old posts, I welcomed those players with open arms. Hence I didn't have any sudden change of opinion like many did when they jumped on their bandwagons.
Gilardino has had 2 good seasons with Parma, went to Milan, then fell apart. That's all we know about him, we can't just assume he will do well in Juve because he's a Juventus fan or because we have a history in relaunching players' carreers. That argument is nonesense. However, we do know that he has failed in the past and was not the player everyone expected him to be.
There's no reason things will be any different in Juve. We have all seen Gila long enough and we know his abilities are limited, he is a goal poacher but when a goal poacher doesn't score any goals, he isn't much of a player at all. It's not like Milan cast a spell on him and made his talent disappear. He's a good player that never lived up to his expectations, that's the harsh reality. He had potential, granted, in fact, I used to enjoy watching him in the Italy U21 days where he was amazing. I would have loved to have that Gila in Juventus. Then, he continued to disappoint in Milan year after year untill it was dead obvious he isn't up to standard.
I wouldn't mind having him on the bench as he could be useful for us in the long run but I would surely not oick him over Amauri. Gila reminds me of Inzaghi, despite his shortcomings in terms of ability, he seems to find himself in the right place at the right time. The only difference between Gila and Inzaghi is that Inzaghi keeps scoring.
I would much rather have a player like Amauri though who promises so much more. Anyway, it's just another day in football where Milan steals the true talent and leaves us to pick at the garbage they left behind.
There's no reason things will be any different in Juve. We have all seen Gila long enough and we know his abilities are limited, he is a goal poacher but when a goal poacher doesn't score any goals, he isn't much of a player at all. It's not like Milan cast a spell on him and made his talent disappear. He's a good player that never lived up to his expectations, that's the harsh reality. He had potential, granted, in fact, I used to enjoy watching him in the Italy U21 days where he was amazing. I would have loved to have that Gila in Juventus. Then, he continued to disappoint in Milan year after year untill it was dead obvious he isn't up to standard.
I wouldn't mind having him on the bench as he could be useful for us in the long run but I would surely not oick him over Amauri. Gila reminds me of Inzaghi, despite his shortcomings in terms of ability, he seems to find himself in the right place at the right time. The only difference between Gila and Inzaghi is that Inzaghi keeps scoring.
I would much rather have a player like Amauri though who promises so much more. Anyway, it's just another day in football where Milan steals the true talent and leaves us to pick at the garbage they left behind.
A defender and a midfielder will arrive regardless of the transfer of Amauri. We will not buy an expensive superstar anyway.
Losing Lanzafame/Nocerino/Palladino/Marchionni/Criscito/Almiron, any combination (not all of them) of these players is acceptable in my book. Marchisio, De Ceglie and Giovinco should be untouchable and if we are about to lose those players, then stepping out of the deal is a must. That I can agree with.
Losing Lanzafame/Nocerino/Palladino/Marchionni/Criscito/Almiron, any combination (not all of them) of these players is acceptable in my book. Marchisio, De Ceglie and Giovinco should be untouchable and if we are about to lose those players, then stepping out of the deal is a must. That I can agree with.
why? its true. he wants to play for italy but if brazil call hes ready to jump on a plane. he doesnt know if he wants to go to juve or milan. you really think that if barca or real come knocking if hes playing for us hes going to be loyal? i dont think so.
i like him, but it doesnt mean that i cant see what kind of player he is. we have no big headed players in our team since ibra.
i like him, but it doesnt mean that i cant see what kind of player he is. we have no big headed players in our team since ibra.
He wants to play for the NT? Hardly a mercenary. Of course his 1st choice would be Brazil if he was to be called but if not, he is willing to help Italy. How is that a mercenary? He would be a mercenary if he wanted to be paid heavily for doing nothing, which isn't the case. I think you are seriously confusing mercenary with some other word. Not all players can bleed black & white.
If his home country calls for him to play there, why the fuck we say no? Is he not a Brazilian, isn't that what Brazilians want to do? Play for Brazil?
I don't understand how you are talking about loyalty, he has yet to do anything that suggests he isn't loyal. He gets and offer from Juve and an offer from Milan, he tries to ponder his next destination that could be crucial at this stage in his career. Does that make him disloyal, unfaithful?
He doesn't have a big head, he just wants to do what's in his best interest. Is that so wrong? Is it inhuman to look out for yourself and evaluate your options before you make a decision? I really can't understand your logic.
I don't understand how you are talking about loyalty, he has yet to do anything that suggests he isn't loyal. He gets and offer from Juve and an offer from Milan, he tries to ponder his next destination that could be crucial at this stage in his career. Does that make him disloyal, unfaithful?
He doesn't have a big head, he just wants to do what's in his best interest. Is that so wrong? Is it inhuman to look out for yourself and evaluate your options before you make a decision? I really can't understand your logic.
http://www.calciomercato.com/index.php?c=7&a=80520
Palermo say their not dealing with any other club other than Juve and the newspapers are inventing the Milan link as they have had no contact from them.
Palermo say their not dealing with any other club other than Juve and the newspapers are inventing the Milan link as they have had no contact from them.
I don't see why people are saying amauri is better then gila, on current form yes
however amauri has only ever had 2 good seasons like gila, however gila is younger and showed more potential than amauri, a change of secenery could do gila the world of good and would you refuse the gila of Parma? This is why I think he would be a better coup then amauri plus it would save us a hell of a lot of money so we can strengthen else where
however amauri has only ever had 2 good seasons like gila, however gila is younger and showed more potential than amauri, a change of secenery could do gila the world of good and would you refuse the gila of Parma? This is why I think he would be a better coup then amauri plus it would save us a hell of a lot of money so we can strengthen else where
first of all we should think about bringing in a player for the starting XI or a player who is a 4th choice striker.... gila is just a shadow of hisself and is just a big flop.. i wouldn't risk to bring him to juve for around 10mil or more.... amauri is much better and he has even the chance to play in the starting XI.... same goes for our defenders no need for free transfers is they are just backups...please buy us a wc cb.... or atleast a lb ....
amauri who is in the form of his life now. You cannot compare him to gila when he was in the form of his lifeatleast he is on form now 
but still i am against both i would go for hunterlaar and if we don't get him lets play with trezeguet delpiero iaquinta and palla for one more season...we have the best attack in italy so why would we need to buy a new striker so badly? lets go for 1-2 defenders and atleast a wc playmaker...
but still i am against both i would go for hunterlaar and if we don't get him lets play with trezeguet delpiero iaquinta and palla for one more season...we have the best attack in italy so why would we need to buy a new striker so badly? lets go for 1-2 defenders and atleast a wc playmaker...
atleast he is on form now but still i am against both i would go for hunterlaar and if we don't get him lets play with trezeguet delpiero iaquinta and palla for one more season...we have the best attack in italy so why would we need to buy a new striker so badly? lets go for 1-2 defenders and atleast a wc playmaker...
but still i am against both i would go for hunterlaar and if we don't get him lets play with trezeguet delpiero iaquinta and palla for one more season...we have the best attack in italy so why would we need to buy a new striker so badly? lets go for 1-2 defenders and atleast a wc playmaker...
joaquin was a better player than c.ronaldo a few years back you tell me who is better now?
- Status