i mistyped my previous post..i meant to say how IS sanchez considered better than aguero given their records
both are young and have tremendous talent but Aguero has proven himself to be a star ever since he was 17 back in argentina with Independiente
whiel like u said Sanchez has ONLY had half a season which makes him so "great"
i just fail to comprehend how such a price tag can be placed on him with only half a season of raping shit up
if he was rated at 25mill and aguero at 45mill then fine it makes sense..but when we offer 35 for aguero while we offer 35 and two players for sanchez it just doesnt make any sense to me
if anything aguero should be our top priority cuz if we play our cards right he is the type of player that would more likely continue to fulfill his promise with us and him suceeding here would help lure in more big names in the future
if sanchez comes and flops or fails to live up to his potential we will be back to square 1,in trying to lure stars to come play for us
this is just my opinion..somewhat biased cuz ever since i saw Aguero play in the u20 wc here in Canada i thought he was a star in the making and he has achieved that with aplomb i think
ive caught a few atleti games this season and he has been exceptional..and if he knew before he announced it that he intended on leaving and kept giving his all then imagine what he would do if he wanted to impress
Umm, ofcourse Sanchez and Higuain, I like what Matri offers as it is, but seems some overrate him? Or Overrate Aguero to the point you would take him over Sanchez and Higauin. That is if you want the former option mainly for Aguero, which is likely.
Villarreal have decided they need to keep him until mid-July at least, to try to avoid embarrassment when they play Aberdeen in the great Darren Mackie's testimonial.
Villarreal have decided they need to keep him until mid-July at least, to try to avoid embarrassment when they play Aberdeen in the great Darren Mackie's testimonial.
.
