Al-Qaeda wants in @ the 2010 world cup!!!! (9 Viewers)

Bjerknes

Bjerknes

"Top Economist"
#62
Mar 16, 2004
111,704
#62
In all seriousness I bet there are quite a lot of people who would want to see this happen. If it were to happen then I'd assume they'd have to cancel the entire event, thus ruining it for everyone else.
 
Nicholas

Nicholas

MIRKO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
#65
Jan 30, 2008
38,737
#65
InsouciantTerrorist said:
In all seriousness I bet there are quite a lot of people who would want to see this happen. If it were to happen then I'd assume they'd have to cancel the entire event, thus ruining it for everyone else.
Click to expand...
There is no doubt that the event would be cancelled and rightfully so. Imagine the retaliation that would come after such an incident though, it would be ruthless.
 
Fred

Fred

Senior Member
#69
Oct 2, 2003
41,113
#69
Nick19 said:
There could be some hiding there, best to make sure to erradicate them.
Click to expand...
there is an equal chance of there being Al Qaeda members in London as there is in Baghdad, Iraq has nothing to do with Al Qaeda.

Afghanistan i would understand(or would i?), but Iraq?

I don't know if your serious or not, but do you really advocate killing innocent people just because they share the same nationality/religion as a group of radicals that planted a bomb somewhere, even though the potentially bombed country jails people for being a member of that group of radicals?

I don't know, maybe its just me, but somehow that doesn't make sense.

Ahmed said:
thankfully I did not renew my membership this year :juventus:
Click to expand...
:D
 
Nicholas

Nicholas

MIRKO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
#73
Jan 30, 2008
38,737
#73
Fred said:
there is an equal chance of there being Al Qaeda members in London as there is in Baghdad, Iraq has nothing to do with Al Qaeda.

Afghanistan i would understand(or would i?), but Iraq?

I don't know if your serious or not, but do you really advocate killing innocent people just because they share the same nationality/religion as a group of radicals that planted a bomb somewhere, even though the potentially bombed country jails people for being a member of that group of radicals?

I don't know, maybe its just me, but somehow that doesn't make sense.


:D
Click to expand...
Would you believe me if I told you I had a bunch of Neo Nazi tattoes a skin head and donned white clothing with a white pointy hat. If you don't then there is your answer to the above.

I only condone killing Muslims on Call of Duty online, nowhere else dude.
 
Fred

Fred

Senior Member
#75
Oct 2, 2003
41,113
#75
Nick19 said:
Would you believe me if I told you I had a bunch of Neo Nazi tattoes a skin head and donned white clothing with a white pointy hat. If you don't then there is your answer to the above.

I only condone killing Muslims on Call of Duty online, nowhere else dude.
Click to expand...
I'm offended :D
 
PhRoZeN

PhRoZeN

Livin with Mediocre
#76
Mar 29, 2006
15,893
#76
Nick19 said:
:p

Ragheads is more appropriate
Click to expand...
Abnormal, I see indians being called pakey here, anyone with a slight tan is a paki. Ragheads, getting common I guess but the term pakey is just so overused.

I hear burnley near your ends is a deadly place to go.
 
Byrone

Byrone

Peen Meister
#78
Dec 19, 2005
30,778
#78
Nick19 said:
Would you believe me if I told you I had a bunch of Neo Nazi tattoes a skin head and donned white clothing with a white pointy hat. If you don't then there is your answer to the above.

I only condone killing Muslims on Call of Duty online, nowhere else dude.
Click to expand...
:lol: :lol:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 9)