Aguero or Sanchez? (2 Viewers)

[blem]

let just sign both of them with pastore also

attack
krasic-pastore-sanchez
aguero

And who's paying for those?

 

Buy on AliExpress.com

[generous88]

I believe Aguero is more proven than Sanchez

 

[IlPrincipino]

Aguero, no doubts about that.

 

[Ahmed]

Il Kun, all day and any day.

 

[El Santo]

Does it really matter? We desperately need one of these two in Juve. Either one will do.

 

[Ahmed]

we don't need need them.

 

[Brujitas]

Kun is the first choice of course. Incredible player.
But , to be honest i 'd welcome tevez , sanchez , pastore , anyone of them....

 

[C4ISR]

I wrote this in another thread:

Sanchez makes 700k a season at Udinese and Aguero 5m at Atletico. Both would receive a pay increase upon completion of a 30+ million euro move. 3m a season would represent a fair wage for Sanchez considering what he is currently on, whereas Aguero could ask for w/e he wants considering his reputation and the fact he is a more established player after competing in UEFA competitions for a few seasons.

Media reports are saying Aguero would want 7m season. That represents a difference of 4m a season between the 2. After taxes, and across a 5 year contract, that is a 40m euro difference between players. A massive difference that is hard to justify considering Juventus' total revenue and the coming of FFP.

...

Aguero is certainly the more proven player atm, but any1 who has watched Sanchez grow over the past 2 seasons will certainly tell you the difference is negligible, especially when a 40m euro difference separates the 2 over the length of their contracts.

I vote Sanchez, even if I believe Aguero is the better player atm. The difference is marginal though, and both would certainly make us a more dangerous team.

Transfer fees are only 1 part of the equation when building a squad, and I'm just worried the rest of the team will consist of Ziegler's and Pazienza's (low wage players) if we sign Aguero.

 

[MikeM]

The thing is we are not in Europe this year so we don`t need depth. We can splash on one player and not worry about our bench. It`s ok to have Pazienza on the bench because he will never play this year.

Then next year it`s a whole new ballgame. What if our splash on Aguero nets us CL qualification, then we have more money next year.

 

[El Santo]

we don't need need them.

I see you got high hopes for Quagliarella.

 

[Bianconero_Aus]

Either one of them would be fantastic, but my choice would be El Kun.

 

[Arabian Juve]

i prefer Sanchez
but Aguero has more positives media than the Chilean man

 

[Arabian Juve]

i fear we talk all the summer about Sanchez , Pastore and Aguero
and the end will be with Gilaridinnnnnnnnnnnnooooh

 

[Gabriel]

Aguero to Chelsea, Sanchez to Juve.

 

[dodo]

If Aguero is 40-45M + super high wages, then I prefer Sanchez for 25-30. With the remaining 15-20M, we could get another good player like Inler, a defender or Hazard instead of Bastos for example. But any of these names (aguero, sanchez, pastore, hazard, neymar, tevez) would be great.

 

[adriano_c]

Aguero to Chelsea, Sanchez to Juve.

More like Bendtner to Juve.

 

[Nenz]

Aguero would be a better addition IMO. 45M + 7.5M wages though. Its pretty wild.

 

[only-juve]

Depends on the price

 

[da_ledgeaun]

Aguero for me.. But i would really like Neymar!! in Juve more than anyone right now

 

[Ken]

To get the obvious out of the way: I would be extremely happy with either player at Juve...


If I had to pick between the players, skillwise, I'd say Kun.