Adrian Mutu (3 Viewers)

[Maher]

good to see mutu score

 

Buy on AliExpress.com

[The Goalkeeper]

I was just wondering about what someone said earlier on, Could camo play in the left field????

 

[Eddy]

Hmm, I really dont like the sound of that

 

[The Goalkeeper]

Hmm, I really dont like the sound of that

Me neither but i was just wondering

 

[zizoufan]

Me neither but i was just wondering

drole de signature !
je suis gardien
je suis salopard !

 

[Paolo Sosa]

Camo on the left, noway. he took a season to settle in our team y change him and go through this horrible time again.

and if u r refering to me i said Mutu, Zlatan, Viera covering the left flank but camo stay on the right.

 

[Tedi Issajanian]

I love Adrian Mutu, what a player!

@ m_elayyan

Against La Viola? He was the best player against Fiorentina so I dont know what you are talking about, he was really good. Worked very hard and so. Either left or right winger. Also as forward.

Cheers!

Forza Grande Mutu!

 

[italian_stylez]

He has been fantastic, after his problems, now he just wants to play, and he is very grateful to Juve for beleiving in him, and now he is repaying the club with great performances, great desicion to get him.

 

[baggio]

And it will be an even better decision to hold on to him.

 

[Paolo Sosa]

but when he plays as a RM he seems to be kinda lost. i like him on the left

 

[Eddy]

hes mostly a lefty

 

[Lawnchair Bes]

but when he plays as a RM he seems to be kinda lost. i like him on the left

thats why when he is on the field we even move neddy on the right to leave the left side to him

 

[ßöмßäяðîëя]

Like word, yay.

 

[Dominic]

I was just wondering about what someone said earlier on, Could camo play in the left field????

Why would you want to try that?

Both Nedved and Mutu are more comfortable on the left.

 

[Espectro]

Mutu fails in Blues appeal


Chelsea have been handed a boost in their bid to claim compensation against former player Adrian Mutu.

The Court of Arbitration for Sport has ruled against Mutu after he appealed to them against Chelsea's sacking of him in October 2004.

Mutu appealed to Court of Arbitration for Sport after The Premier League ruled Chelsea were within their rights to cancel the Romanian's contract for gross misconduct.

The Premier League also found that Chelsea were entitled to claim compensation against Mutu, who is now at Juventus.

The Swiss-based Court of Arbitration for Sport dismissed Mutu's appeal and ordered the striker to pay Chelsea for the costs of the hearing.

The Blues are attempting to recover some of the £16 million they paid Parma for the Romanian and they have now been given the go-ahead to pursue this matter.

Chelsea will now apply to Fifa for compensation and the football's world governing body will have the final say on the matter.


:sick:

 

[Eddy]

dont they have enough of bling already ?

 

[del pietro]

Hes a major player for juve, as we are able to alternate our attacking line up, something that inter and milan cannot do to great effect.. a major reason for our consistency as oppurtunity for downfall is minimised. Hes growing apart of the team now... many glorious times ahead for mutu.

forza mutu!!

 

[Mr. Gol]

And seeing the article, forza Abramovich' wallet...

 

[Seven]

Mutu fails in Blues appeal


Chelsea have been handed a boost in their bid to claim compensation against former player Adrian Mutu.

The Court of Arbitration for Sport has ruled against Mutu after he appealed to them against Chelsea's sacking of him in October 2004.

Mutu appealed to Court of Arbitration for Sport after The Premier League ruled Chelsea were within their rights to cancel the Romanian's contract for gross misconduct.

The Premier League also found that Chelsea were entitled to claim compensation against Mutu, who is now at Juventus.

The Swiss-based Court of Arbitration for Sport dismissed Mutu's appeal and ordered the striker to pay Chelsea for the costs of the hearing.

The Blues are attempting to recover some of the £16 million they paid Parma for the Romanian and they have now been given the go-ahead to pursue this matter.

Chelsea will now apply to Fifa for compensation and the football's world governing body will have the final say on the matter.


:sick:

Now I believe that's exactly what Bosman changed. They cancelled Mutu's contract, so basically Mutu was earning shit until Juve came along. And now they're claiming he couldn't have gone to Juve without paying any fee although he DID NOT have a contract at Chelsea. So they won't compensation for a player who they didn't only not owned anymore, but who they also fired.

 

[mikhail]

Now I believe that's exactly what Bosman changed. They cancelled Mutu's contract, so basically Mutu was earning shit until Juve came along. And now they're claiming he couldn't have gone to Juve without paying any fee although he DID NOT have a contract at Chelsea. So they won't compensation for a player who they didn't only own, but who they also fired.

I'd agree entirely. On the other hand, I could see some justification in them suing Mutu, but Juve don't owe them a cent.