we need him badly , he maybe the solution to our position , i dont know if mutu can play in a position like kaka or not???
Buy on AliExpress.com
Adrian Mutu (9 Viewers)
- Thread starter Daddi
- Start date
Buy on AliExpress.com
our attackers sux right now..
Stole this from XT......
Chelsea want £8m from Mutu
By Matt Hughes, Evening Standard
4 March 2005
Chelsea are seeking to make legal history with an £8million compensation claim against Adrian Mutu.
Standard Sport revealed in January that Chelsea were considering pursuing their former player for damages after he signed for Juventus and the club have now filed a claim which will be heard by the FA Premier League appeal committee at the end March.
Chelsea are seeking compensation from Mutu based on his transfer value and sporting sanctions against the player under article 42 of FIFA's Regulations for the Status and Transfer of Players. The 26-year-old was sacked last October after testing positive for cocaine, leading to a seven-month ban, but the club claim he repudiated his contract through persistent misconduct.
Chelsea want £8m from Mutu
The FAPL will determine whether Chelsea have a case and hand the matter on to FIFA to determine the level of compensation and any possible sanctions.
Chelsea paid Parma £15.8m for Mutu in 2003 and hope to recoup at least half of that sum, while the FIFA Resolution Chamber could also extend his sevenmonth ban. Although the claim is against the player, directly, any compensation would be paid by Juventus, who signed the Romanian striker in January.
Although there is no legal precedent, Chelsea will cite the case of Ariel Ortega, the Argentina midfielder sacked by Fenerbahce after failing to return from an international friendly. Ortega was prevented from signing for Newell's Old Boys while Fenerbahce launched a claim and he was ordered to pay his former club £6m by FIFA. He also received a six-month ban for breach of contract.
The FAPL appeal committee is a threeman body made up of legal and football experts but will not include Gordon Taylor. The players' union chief executive volunteered his services but was vetoed by Chelsea because of his close links to Mutu.
...........
Can anyone correct me, but if Chelsea goes ahead with this, and wins, appart from having to pay.....He might be banned for further period of time?
Chelsea want £8m from Mutu
By Matt Hughes, Evening Standard
4 March 2005
Chelsea are seeking to make legal history with an £8million compensation claim against Adrian Mutu.
Standard Sport revealed in January that Chelsea were considering pursuing their former player for damages after he signed for Juventus and the club have now filed a claim which will be heard by the FA Premier League appeal committee at the end March.
Chelsea are seeking compensation from Mutu based on his transfer value and sporting sanctions against the player under article 42 of FIFA's Regulations for the Status and Transfer of Players. The 26-year-old was sacked last October after testing positive for cocaine, leading to a seven-month ban, but the club claim he repudiated his contract through persistent misconduct.
Chelsea want £8m from Mutu
The FAPL will determine whether Chelsea have a case and hand the matter on to FIFA to determine the level of compensation and any possible sanctions.
Chelsea paid Parma £15.8m for Mutu in 2003 and hope to recoup at least half of that sum, while the FIFA Resolution Chamber could also extend his sevenmonth ban. Although the claim is against the player, directly, any compensation would be paid by Juventus, who signed the Romanian striker in January.
Although there is no legal precedent, Chelsea will cite the case of Ariel Ortega, the Argentina midfielder sacked by Fenerbahce after failing to return from an international friendly. Ortega was prevented from signing for Newell's Old Boys while Fenerbahce launched a claim and he was ordered to pay his former club £6m by FIFA. He also received a six-month ban for breach of contract.
The FAPL appeal committee is a threeman body made up of legal and football experts but will not include Gordon Taylor. The players' union chief executive volunteered his services but was vetoed by Chelsea because of his close links to Mutu.
...........
Can anyone correct me, but if Chelsea goes ahead with this, and wins, appart from having to pay.....He might be banned for further period of time?
They have no case. Ariel Ortega was still under contract when he refused to return to Fenerbahce and tried to sign a new contract, so the circmstances were very different. Mutu was released by Chelsea and therefore they have no right to ask for compensation as they were the ones that terminated his contract.
IMO the Ariel Ortega case is not remotely connected to Mutu's.
IMO the Ariel Ortega case is not remotely connected to Mutu's.
It does not have to mean that.
If i fire an employee that is under contract here, i can still take him to court and seek compensation if that person ****ed up. Also he/she can take me to court if they think they were fired unjustly.
Chelsea did not forfeit their right to press civil charges against Adrian if they fired him.
If i fire an employee that is under contract here, i can still take him to court and seek compensation if that person ****ed up. Also he/she can take me to court if they think they were fired unjustly.
Chelsea did not forfeit their right to press civil charges against Adrian if they fired him.