3rd Cl. A success in europe would just be great. 3 lost finals in the last 10 years are just too much.
Buy on AliExpress.com
3rd Star or 3rd CL ? (1 Viewer)
- Thread starter DelpieroForLife
- Start date
Buy on AliExpress.com
OP
OP
DelpieroForLife said:
Again... What do ya THINK not WANT 
I think YOU should chill.
I think we'll disappoint again. the occassion will get to us, and arsenal will soak us up and ZAP us on the Counter attack. Out of C.L we go! More slagging down to Capello and the boys. Who we're gonna buy/sell. Who loves DP, How crap was Zlatan.
Think 29 Scudetto will be what we deserve!
THATS WHAT I THINK THINK THINK!!!! :D
Nah, filemon mou,
I'd say we have a 50-50 chance this year for a CL trophy. If we don't get it, I am sure we will replace the "weak" players for next year and grab the double 3.
Lo Scudetto is skill, CL is luck. To say that Juve are a bad side, because we've lost it in the final 3 times is ludicrous (not saying that you said that, amica mia)....a crap side wouldn't have made the finals.
We are the best side in the world ( when we are on).
But Lou, we suck right now
No question. That doesn't take away from the fact that we've been involved in 1/3 of the finals over the last decade. It is frustrating. What is more frustrating is that a side that knows they have no shot in their national competition (see Inter; Arsenal) can rest their better players and concentrate on CL.
Again, you want to see great calcio? How?
You allow only the top 2 teams from each league to compete. Most times that is going to cause a fierce battle between the #1 and #2 teams, and the #2 and #3 teams--improving the games in each domestic league (at least at the top).
OK, Lou, but how do you fill the spots, then?
Expand it. Make Champions League a true Champions League. Add teams from North/South America and Asia. Again--only the top 2. (For these countries, probably only the top 2 teams, ie, not like Europe which has more teams/countries involved because they have the best teams in the world--North America would have, say, the best 2 teams from the 3 countries---not 6 teams)
What a tournament that would be. It would become the club equivalent of the (country) WC.
I'd say we have a 50-50 chance this year for a CL trophy. If we don't get it, I am sure we will replace the "weak" players for next year and grab the double 3.
Lo Scudetto is skill, CL is luck. To say that Juve are a bad side, because we've lost it in the final 3 times is ludicrous (not saying that you said that, amica mia)....a crap side wouldn't have made the finals.
We are the best side in the world ( when we are on).
But Lou, we suck right now
No question. That doesn't take away from the fact that we've been involved in 1/3 of the finals over the last decade. It is frustrating. What is more frustrating is that a side that knows they have no shot in their national competition (see Inter; Arsenal) can rest their better players and concentrate on CL.
Again, you want to see great calcio? How?
You allow only the top 2 teams from each league to compete. Most times that is going to cause a fierce battle between the #1 and #2 teams, and the #2 and #3 teams--improving the games in each domestic league (at least at the top).
OK, Lou, but how do you fill the spots, then?
Expand it. Make Champions League a true Champions League. Add teams from North/South America and Asia. Again--only the top 2. (For these countries, probably only the top 2 teams, ie, not like Europe which has more teams/countries involved because they have the best teams in the world--North America would have, say, the best 2 teams from the 3 countries---not 6 teams)
What a tournament that would be. It would become the club equivalent of the (country) WC.
OP
Tifoso Lou said:
Nah, filemon mou,
I'd say we have a 50-50 chance this year for a CL trophy. If we don't get it, I am sure we will replace the "weak" players for next year and grab the double 3.
Lo Scudetto is skill, CL is luck. To say that Juve are a bad side, because we've lost it in the final 3 times is ludicrous (not saying that you said that, amica mia)....a crap side wouldn't have made the finals.
We are the best side in the world ( when we are on).
But Lou, we suck right now
No question. That doesn't take away from the fact that we've been involved in 1/3 of the finals over the last decade. It is frustrating. What is more frustrating is that a side that knows they have no shot in their national competition (see Inter; Arsenal) can rest their better players and concentrate on CL.
Again, you want to see great calcio? How?
You allow only the top 2 teams from each league to compete. Most times that is going to cause a fierce battle between the #1 and #2 teams, and the #2 and #3 teams--improving the games in each domestic league (at least at the top).
OK, Lou, but how do you fill the spots, then?
Expand it. Make Champions League a true Champions League. Add teams from North/South America and Asia. Again--only the top 2. (For these countries, probably only the top 2 teams, ie, not like Europe which has more teams/countries involved because they have the best teams in the world--North America would have, say, the best 2 teams from the 3 countries---not 6 teams)
What a tournament that would be. It would become the club equivalent of the (country) WC.
I'd say we have a 50-50 chance this year for a CL trophy. If we don't get it, I am sure we will replace the "weak" players for next year and grab the double 3.
Lo Scudetto is skill, CL is luck. To say that Juve are a bad side, because we've lost it in the final 3 times is ludicrous (not saying that you said that, amica mia)....a crap side wouldn't have made the finals.
We are the best side in the world ( when we are on).
But Lou, we suck right now
No question. That doesn't take away from the fact that we've been involved in 1/3 of the finals over the last decade. It is frustrating. What is more frustrating is that a side that knows they have no shot in their national competition (see Inter; Arsenal) can rest their better players and concentrate on CL.
Again, you want to see great calcio? How?
You allow only the top 2 teams from each league to compete. Most times that is going to cause a fierce battle between the #1 and #2 teams, and the #2 and #3 teams--improving the games in each domestic league (at least at the top).
OK, Lou, but how do you fill the spots, then?
Expand it. Make Champions League a true Champions League. Add teams from North/South America and Asia. Again--only the top 2. (For these countries, probably only the top 2 teams, ie, not like Europe which has more teams/countries involved because they have the best teams in the world--North America would have, say, the best 2 teams from the 3 countries---not 6 teams)
What a tournament that would be. It would become the club equivalent of the (country) WC.
I fully agree, CL was much more competitive when only two teams were allowed to compete...