Search results

I'd rather take Huntelaar too. If Dzeko deal fails , the most reasonable approach would be getting Hunter if it is possible. Won't be expensive as other solutions while he can give a lot and prove the quality he holds. Actually getting him and Krasic will be perfect in both economical and...

The most rational approach. :tup:

Hope it's true. :xfinger:

Is this for real? :shifty:

:lol2: This page was great.

Agreed LeTee, I didn't even take him into consideration, just said he is a good player.

Krasic if not Dzeko. :tup: I'd really like Giovinco to stay... we should wait and see.

Sure LeTee, that should be out of question!

I regard him as a good player, cheaper than Dzeko but totally different type of player. merda were linked with him recently.

I like him too. But Hazem, we are the fanboys now. :shifty:

Some members would say "overrated".:andyandbarcelona:

You really think he said that?

:D Indeed his clothing is awful.

Thanks. :D

Since we don't have a time machine who would you pick for that role?

What does this mean?

It is obvious that the new rule is not a problem , we couldn't afford both Dzeko and Krasic anyway. By the way what we need is a deep lying playmaker because Melo, Sissoko or Poulsen are not holding that ability.

Hustini , if I didn't have a chance to see Dzeko before I'd think that you are talking about the 3 heads, 4 arms, 4 legs monster with Mesi's technique, McManaman's acceleration and speed and Essien's strength.

1- we had a very bad season, football is a team game, and he can't play alone. 2- he was not with his national team obviously because of that bad season. At the end it was Dunga's choice and I don't consider him as a coach with a "good taste".

Diego is staying , he is one of our most important players here.