Search results

The boy has performed in highest level in CL. I'm sure he won't have any problem in Serie A. But I don't think he's Juve bound.

Ok I have not seen those. But again the premise was that if we already signed 2 defenders then we won't try for DeLigt. I can agree with that. De Ligt will go to a club that satisfies both Ajax's and Raiola's demands. After Pogba this is his crown jewel. He won't give him up easily.

No, but in case of Romero Genoa president said that he's going to Juve, and for Demiral it was reported by a lot of outlets.

Fiorentina statement is very odd given that the sale of the club is being finalized. 1559565052 He says it's unrealistic, meaning we won't spend big on him since we already got 2 new defenders.

I just explained what he said. To me the clause itself with or without deadline doesn't make sense. But stranger things have happened before.

What he means is that June 15 deadline makes no sense, because if Pep wanted to free himself from his contract because the other party did something unethical, then it doesn't make sense to put a deadline on it.

Which means we will have a 50% chance, or better said, we'll reach the final :scared:

Perhaps genius is a strong word, but if he gets two very improbable stories (CR7, Pep) and one less improbable one (Allegri out) correct then I wouldn't call him just lucky. I'd think he has sources inside the top management.

Mombly is either a genius or a madman, and I'm inclined towards the latter. 15 June deadline is so convenient for him since if we announce anyone after that he'll blame UEFA. Of course I hope I'm wrong and Mombly is indeed a genius.

Oh my goodness. First of all you did not respond to what I said so I'm not sure why you quoted me. Second, I remember in 2014-15 people were complaining here that Pirlo plays too much, he can't provide any defensive cover, ... 3rd, Pogba and Pjanic were also among his favorite midfielders. Pogba...

People who put the blame on Pirlo's departure only on Allegri should explain why his contract was winding down in the first place.

Poli played only 4 months under Allegri. That's pretty quick to elevate you to "favorite" status.

You don't agree to any stupid clause if there's no indication of the condition being met. There's not enough paper in the world to print possible conditions on.

So safe to assume Pep has a clause like "if it rains in Honolulu in 21st September 2017 then I'll walk"? Sanctions against City were lifted a year before that. There was nothing that even suggested they might get sanctioned again especially now this this gigantic TV deal.

Do every coach get a no-CL-I-walk clause? Why would City agree to that in 2016 when there was no indication of a ban?

Huh?

Meaning a gentleman agreement of sort?

That should be social media employees.

That's not a big issue though. Insisting on the clause is. I highly doubt there's any clause. 1559501216 I'm not sure, but I don't think UEFA has the authority of handing out transfer bans. That's why they only ban/sanction clubs from Uefa competitions. Edit: I was wrong. They can hand out...

Of course. That's Mombly's exit strategy. Last year Milan's ban arrived late June. Anyway there's no way that clause is True.