Search results

  1. Red

    [Serie A] Bologna 0-2 JUVENTUS (March 16, 2013)

    Why would they?
  2. Red

    [Serie A] Bologna 0-2 JUVENTUS (March 16, 2013)

    Lazio play football in a style I approve of more often than Juve do. Hadn't seen that until now. That goal wasn't really relevant to Aberdeen. A win was needed, and that was already gone before that goal went in.
  3. Red

    [Serie A] Bologna 0-2 JUVENTUS (March 16, 2013)

    :agree: If people want to play Marchisio as the primary support to a striker, it would need to be like Perrotta played behind Totti in Spalletti's Roma. No way should Marchisio actually be starting high enough up the pitch to actually be considered a forward.
  4. Red

    [Serie A] Bologna 0-2 JUVENTUS (March 16, 2013)

    Thought Juve were very good there. Don't know if it was the Juve's intention going into the game to sit deep, but it was apparent from early on the Bologna were intent on attacking and pressing, so Juve did the appropriate thing and took a step back instead of being drawn into an open game...
  5. Red

    [Serie A] Bologna 0-2 JUVENTUS (March 16, 2013)

    Ah. You seem to be working off the same wonderful logic that the Celtic fans were using when they assumed they'd beat Juve because they beat Barca.
  6. Red

    [Serie A] Bologna 0-2 JUVENTUS (March 16, 2013)

    You expecting the ref to give Juve a goal of a head start like he gave Milan?
  7. Red

    [Serie A] Bologna 0-2 JUVENTUS (March 16, 2013)

    That's what GdS says, but it had Giovinco starting rather than Matri. Doubts over Giovinvo-Matri and Peluso-Asamoah, though.